Whenever we load a circuit, there's a drop from the open circuit voltage $$\v_{oc}\$$ due to the internal source resistance or Thevenin's resistance$$\R_{th}\$$. So we need to have an $$\R_{load}\$$ that is very large compared to $$\R_{th}\$$, (i.e) $$R_{load}>>R_{th}$$ so that almost all the voltage drop occurs across $$\R_{load}\$$ . But according to maximum power transfer theorem we need to have an $$\R_{load}\$$ that is equal to the $$\R_{th}\$$ to obtain maximum power transfer. Aren't these two statements contradictory, maybe contradictory isn't the right word, but you get it. So, which one do we need to follow while constructing a circuit.

You are in good company. The maximum power transfer concept frequently causes confusion. Take note of the fact that maximum power transfer does not mean maximum power efficiency. I think this may be the main point that trips people up.

In fact, when Rload = Rsource, then the maximum possible efficiency is 50%, since the load and source will be consuming equal power. If the goal is to extract power from the source at the highest possible rate, then the load and source should be matched.

But often, it is more important to protect the source from getting hot, or to maximize power efficiency from the standpoint of DC input power to the amplifier. In these cases, Rsource should be much lower than Rload. You see this in audio amplifiers, for example. Also, usually when you are discharging a battery, you make sure Rload is much greater than Rbattery to avoid over-heating the battery.

Another point is that when signals need to pass through transmission lines (such as coaxial cable or similar) the load must be matched to the source (and line) to prevent reflections or other signal degradation.

Key points

• Maximum power transfer is not maximum efficiency.
• When maximum energy efficiency is desired in an amplifier, source impedance should be kept low compared to load.
• Sometimes, when transmission lines are involved, power concerns are secondary, and signal integrity dictates that load and source be matched (to avoid reflections).
• So it depends on our needs? Commented Apr 24, 2019 at 6:25
• Yes, it depends on the overall goals and constraints (like many things in engineering). But I have tried to be somewhat specific. I don't think "it depends" is a good answer. Commented Apr 24, 2019 at 6:35
• So, my question makes sense right? If we increase the load, there will be a decrease in efficiency (below 50%) Commented Apr 24, 2019 at 6:39
• When Rload << Rsource, efficiency will be very low. When Rload=Rsource, efficiency will be 50% (for ideal source/load). When Rload >> Rsource, efficiency will be relatively high. Commented Apr 24, 2019 at 6:43

The answer to the apparent contradiction relates to the inverse relation between resistance and power, mixed with a direct relation between resistance and voltage. These thoughts can quickly become misleading. After all, the power dissipated by a resistor is proportional to voltage squared: $$P = \frac{V_{load}^2}{R_{load}}$$ So the first instinct is to assume to maximize $$\P\$$, one should maximize $$\V_{load}\$$. Using a Thevenin voltage source, the resistor divisor means the maximal $$\V_{load} = V_{th}\$$ occurs when $$\R_{load} >> R_{th}\$$.

However, remember another expression for power: $$P = V_{load} I_{load}$$

you can quickly assess that, increasing $$\R_{load}\$$ all the way to $$\+\infty\$$ (an open circuit), no current flows and $$\P=0\$$. In the same manner, with $$\R_{load} = 0\$$ (a short circuit) there is no voltage drop, and again $$\P=0\$$. This means the maximal power transferred is neither at an extremely high nor extremely low $$\R_{load}\$$. In fact, the maximal power is when both current and voltage meet "halfway". This happens when $$\R_{load}=R_{th}\$$.

You are confusing power transfer and voltage transfer.

To have maximum voltage transfer Rload >> Rsource.

To have maximum power transfer Rload == Rsource.

The reason is that as Rload goes up, more of the source voltage is dropped across Rload but the total current flowing in the circuit decreases.

• I don't get it . Can you elucidate more? $R_{th}$ is not equal to $R_{load}$ right? can you design a simple circuit as an example if possible? Commented Apr 24, 2019 at 5:44
• Commented Apr 24, 2019 at 5:49