3
\$\begingroup\$

Background

I'll be making a "micro thermal power station" in the single-digit watt range at home (one-off, educational project. Bear with me). A heat source, likely ethanol, will cause a stirling engine to turn a DC motor, used as a generator. The topic of the educational part is to focus on efficiency. To this end I want to see where the energy is wasted on each stage. Measuring the electrical part (after the generator) is easy. The problem is the previous stages (heat→motion and motion→electrical). Also measuring the end-to-end efficiency is not hard (X ml of 95% ethanol is Y joules and so forth). The biggest unknown is the heat→motion part. I tried asking the stirling engine manufacturers and they haven't measured it. But if I figure out the generator part, then I can infer the heat→motion part.

Questions

Efficiency of DC motors when used as generators

I have several DC motors laying around at home, some DC (e.g. Mitsumi M36N-2), some BLDC (selected inrunners with Kv about 250). From what I've seen in datasheets like the Mitsumi's it is expected that the motors have the highest efficiency (when used as motors) when they are lightly loaded (around 10% of the stall torque). Is it reasonable to assume that the efficiency peak when used as generators will be in the same conditions?

Measuring efficiency with homebrew methods

Most of the motors I can use don't have datasheets, so their efficiency is unknown. I don't have a dynamometer, otherwise this part would've been easy. I came up with a method to measure the efficiency:

  • attach a spool to the shaft of the motor;
  • the spool has a known proof mass attached to the end of the thread;
  • the motor is loaded with known resistance (if it's the BLDC, then three equal resistors);
  • the whole setup is placed high near the ceiling;
  • as the mass is released, it unspools the thread, rotating the motor. Record the output voltage with a DSO;
  • integrate the power over time, and compare to the potential energy that the proof mass had before releasing;
  • changing the mass or load can simulate different load conditions.

So I have something, but seems too cumbersome, and it also introduces other unknowns. I'm wondering about other approaches to this measurement problem. I may be missing something simpler. Any ideas?

Disclaimer

The question may be more appropriate for other SE sites. Please suggest if you think it's better asked elsewhere.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ See if you can mount the generator motor in a cradle such that you can measure the exerted torque, and then simply spin it with another motor while monitoring rotational rate. Getting alignment right may be hard, but your scale sounds small enough that a 3d printer and or building toys may work, and you may be able to use something like a rollerblade bearing for the cradle with the motor shaft passing right through. \$\endgroup\$ – Chris Stratton Apr 25 at 20:50
2
\$\begingroup\$

There are two main groups of losses in these machines.

  1. Ohmic losses in the windings, brushes and brush to commutator interface. These losses are more or less proportional to the current squared through the machine.

  2. Iron losses, which for a permanent magnet machine are fairly constant with load, but vary with speed, proportional to a power of somewhere between 1 and 2. It is a sum of losses due to eddy currents in the iron, and hysteresis losses, and these two have different relationships to the frequency of the changing filed i.e. speed.

  3. Friction losses - usually a fairly constant torque, so the power loss is speed proportional.

  4. Windage - the air drag, proportional to some power of the speed, though for small machines it generally is not a significant proportion.

2,3,4 tend to get lumped together, since they're modeled as a torque loss from the electrical power the machine is presenting to the rotor - the input power (simply V * I for a DC machine) less the Ohmic losses.

The upshot of this is, as you say, the efficiency peaks fairly low on the torque axis, as the output power falls away from the input power as the ohmic losses rise. Max power comes at about half stall torque.

from https://electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/346998/voltage-current-torque-and-speed-in-dc-motors

For machines that have a separate field, there's a test called a Hopkinson test that can be done on two identical machines with the shafts coupled together. You adjust the field strength until one of the machines generates the right voltage to be able to feed the motoring machine at full load current, and so the losses alone are fed from an external supply.

With a PM machine you don't have the luxury of doing that, but you can apply the principle. Running at the same current, the losses in both machines will be the same, so you can calculate the losses by the difference in the power supplied to one motor, and the power generated by the second motor generated into a resistive load bank. You don't get to know the torque generated, but that's not that important. You can calculate the mechanical power, should you want to know it, as the mean value of the two powers you measure i.e. the input power less half the losses, which should be in the first machine.

So all you need to do this is a power supply, two of the motors in question, some means of coupling them together, two each of voltmeters and ammeters and a load bank. If you adjust the load bank until the current generated is the same as the motor current, and measure the voltage at the output, you can determine the power in and out.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Many thanks for the method suggested, I have a few clarifying questions though. The method requires two identical motors of each model, however I have only A, A', B, B', C and D (e.g. A and A' are two pcs of the same model). I'm thinking about using your method to get the efficiency curve on A using A-A'. Then test A-B, A-C and A-D, using the measured curve to compute the curve for B, C and D. Is that a good idea, or there are caveats I'm not considering? \$\endgroup\$ – anrieff Apr 26 at 19:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ Question 2, consider two identical BLDCs, I'm pretty sure that you can't run this method precisely, as the losses in the ESC would be hard to model and definitely not the same as the losses in the 3-phase rectifier after the generator. Can the test setup be improved to cater for BLDCs as well? \$\endgroup\$ – anrieff Apr 26 at 19:15
  • \$\begingroup\$ Once you have the losses determined for the motors you have pairs of, you can then use one of those as a generating load for the other motors. For BLDCs, separating the losses of the controller from the motor is not easy unless you have a 3 phase power analyzer. Even determining the loss in a rectifier isn't straightforward. \$\endgroup\$ – Phil G Apr 29 at 13:30
  • \$\begingroup\$ why use tested motors as loads, why not use them as motors? As you say, determining the loss in the rectifier isn't straightforward, but I think it's much easier than determining the controller losses. \$\endgroup\$ – anrieff May 3 at 6:22
1
\$\begingroup\$

When determining efficiency, keeping track of where the energy is going can be quite difficult. If the motor efficiency is 70 percent, the losses are 30 percent of the input. If you can only determine the input power and output power with a 95 percent accuracy, the actual input power could be 5% higher than measured and the actual output poser could be 5% lower than measured. That means that it is possible that the losses determined from input and output measurement may be up to 33% higher or lower than the actual losses.

With the thread and spool method, you must consider the energy lost in the friction of the mechanism and the potential energy converted to kinetic energy of the falling weight and the rotating mass.

What Chris Stratton suggests is essentially constructing a dynamometer using the motor as an absorber. The diagram below shows what is required. The trunion mounting system allows the absorber housing to turn freely by a few degrees to allow the scale to measure the force exerted by the arm extending from the housing. Torque is the force multiplied by the length of the force arm to the shaft center. Torque multiplied by speed is mechanical power.

Whether the motor is acting as a motor or a generator, a force is generated between the stator and rotor. The rotor force is transmitted or received through the motor shaft. The stator force is normally transmitted through the motor housing to the platform on which it is mounted. The grunion bearings permit the motor housing to rotate. The rotation of the motor housing is prevented by the torque arm. The torque arm is prevented from moving by the scale or force transducer that is connected between the arm and mounting surface.

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Could you please elaborate the (homebrew) implementation of the torque arm / torque measurement? \$\endgroup\$ – Huisman Apr 25 at 21:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Huisman an arm of known length with calibrated masses to add untill the torque generated is balanced. Then total mass gives torque ie application of force * distance \$\endgroup\$ – Solar Mike Apr 25 at 22:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ @SolarMike But how does the motor generate this torque? How is the motor torque applied to the arm? \$\endgroup\$ – Huisman Apr 27 at 18:34
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Huisman every force has an equal and opposite reaction. So, if the armature is delvering a force of X, then the frame has to suuport a force of -X which means if the frame is mounted on bearings then that force can be measured. \$\endgroup\$ – Solar Mike Apr 27 at 18:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ See revision to my answer. \$\endgroup\$ – Charles Cowie Apr 27 at 18:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.