1
\$\begingroup\$

I'm trying to understand the proper biasing procedure of a cascode distributed amplifier part that requires three power supplies. A positive drain-source VDD, a negative gate-source VGG1, and a second, positive gate-source VGG2.

enter image description here

The recommended biasing procedure is for the bottom MESFET VGG1 to be supplied, then the drain-source VDD, and finally the top MESFET VGG2.

I don't know much about amplifier operation, I was tasked to document the proper biasing procedure for parts and determine if there will be an issue. Case in point the VGG2 may be supplied by a linear regulator that's always on while VGG1 and VDD will be controllable. I want to understand what the ramifications of having VGG2 always being on

***EXTRA: I could also use help in trying to model the situation in ADS to have a visual representation of the problem.

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

In order for the MESFET \$\mathrm{FET_1}\$ to work in saturation region, you should require that $$ |V_{DS_\mathrm{FET_1}}|\ge |V_{P_\mathrm{\,FET_1}}|+|V_{GS_\mathrm{FET_1}}|, \label{1}\tag{1} $$ where \$V_{P_\mathrm{\,FET_1}}\$ is the pinch off (threshold) gate-source voltage of the MESFET. This implies that the quiescent value of \$V_{GG_2}\$ must be chosen in such a way that \eqref{1} is satisfied, and in turn this implies that $$ V_{GG_2}\gg V_\gamma, $$ where \$V_\gamma\$ is the threshold voltage of the \$\mathrm{FET_2}\$ Gate-Source GaAs Schottky junction: normally, this is not a problem since when \$V_{DS_\mathrm{FET_1}}\$ is at its quiescent value \$V_{DSQ_\mathrm{FET_1}}\$, then $$ V_{GSQ_\mathrm{FET_2}}=V_{GG_2}-V_{DSQ_\mathrm{FET_1}}<0 $$ However, if you apply \$V_{GG_2}\$ before applying \$V_{GG_1}\$ then, since \$V_{DS_\mathrm{FET_1}}\$ is still nearly zero, the \$\mathrm{FET_2}\$ Gate-Source GaAs Schottky junction would became forward biased with a high value of gate current \$I_{G_\mathrm{FET_2}}\$ which would permanently damage the device: in sum in order to avoid permanent damages to the MESFETs, it is better to follow the recommended biasing sequence.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Is it possible use a negative Vss1 so you can cascade Vdd2 at the same DC voltage to the next Vgg in to make a distributed amplifier? Or is DC biasing isolated between stages \$\endgroup\$ – Sunnyskyguy EE75 May 28 at 21:28
  • \$\begingroup\$ Since \$V_{GSQ_\mathrm{FET_1}}\$ is usually <0 for MESFETs, it is possible to use a positive \$V_{SS_1}\$ instead of a negative \$V_{GG_1}\$: to my knowledge, DC biasing between RF/MW stages, need not to be isolated. However, years ago \$V_{SS}\$ biasing was not advocated because it was difficult to realize a source decoupling network with adequate low impedance at high frequency: this was especially true for low noise stages. \$\endgroup\$ – Daniele Tampieri May 29 at 5:53
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @DanieleTampieri Thank you very much for your response and breaking it down for me. I understand to an extent where I feel I can document the issue and go forward with looking at options to fix it. \$\endgroup\$ – aj_intern2019 May 29 at 11:46
  • \$\begingroup\$ @aj_intern2019 You are welcome. And if you find my answer useful, please consider upvoting and accepting it. \$\endgroup\$ – Daniele Tampieri May 29 at 11:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ @DanieleTampieri I have upvoted and accepted your answer. I do not have enough points for the upvote to display however. But again I appreciate your response. Have a nice day. \$\endgroup\$ – aj_intern2019 May 29 at 11:52

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.