2
\$\begingroup\$

I'm trying to find $$\frac{V2}{V1}$$ as a function of x. Op amp

I found this circuit but noone gave good explanation. I think I understand the way this potentiometer works, but I just can't work out the equations to get result. Also I tried to simulate this circuit and here is result (for simulation I assumed x=1) :

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ Why is R3 connected to the op-amp output? Study the original circuit carefully. \$\endgroup\$ – Andy aka Jun 5 at 12:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ Because Potentiometer R could be viewed as 2 resistors xR and (1-x)R . Since 1 of them is short circuited, there is just resistor xR left. Since I assumed x=1 then xR=R and in simulation that resistance is named R3 \$\endgroup\$ – Aleksandar Simonović Jun 5 at 12:17
  • \$\begingroup\$ Nice observation sir. I missed that. \$\endgroup\$ – Aleksandar Simonović Jun 5 at 12:20
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ No, The pot can't be viewed as xR and (1 - x)R since the wiper is connected to one end. It can only be considered as xR and 0R. The dot at the bottom of R3 should not be there. \$\endgroup\$ – Transistor Jun 5 at 12:30
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I wrote that (1-x)R is short circuited so that is same sa 0R \$\endgroup\$ – Aleksandar Simonović Jun 5 at 12:47
1
\$\begingroup\$

This is easier than it looks. I won't solve it all the way, but lets call the voltage at the top of the pot \$V_a\$ and the voltage at the bottom of the pot, \$V_b\$. Lets call the positive input \$V_{1+}\$ and the negative, \$V_{1+}\$. The input terminals of the op amp are \$V_-\$ and \$V_+\$.

Using the rule that no current enters the op amp, it is straightforward to show that \$V_a=2V_- - V_{1+}\$. Using the rule the \$V_- = V_+\$, it is straightforward to show that \$V_b = 2V_- - V_{1-}\$. Now, we know the voltage at either side of the pot, and the value of the pot, so \$i_{pot} = \frac{(V_a-V_b)}{(1-X)R} = \frac{V_{1-} - V_{1+}}{(1-X)R}\$

Application of Kirchoff's current law to the node at the top of the pot should give you \$V_2\$

\$\endgroup\$
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Kirchhoff's current law to node: \$0 = \frac{(V_a-V_2)}{R} + \frac{V_{1-} - V_{1+}}{(1-X)R} + \frac{(V_{1+} - V_-)}{R} \$ .. \$0 = \frac{(V_a-V_2)}{R} - \frac{V_1}{(1-X)R} + \frac{(V_{1+} - V_-)}{R} \$ \$\endgroup\$ – Aleksandar Simonović Jun 5 at 18:31
0
\$\begingroup\$

Well, I think it is a tricky circuit - and it is not a simple task to derive the gain formula. Therefore, I recommend to split the calculation in separate steps:

(1) Set the lower input (we call it vi2) to zero vi2=0 and find the inverting gain as a function of the upper voltage (vi1): Vout1=f(vi1). This is relatively simple by applying the star-to-triangle conversion method for the negative feedback loop.

(2) Set the upper input to zero (vi1=0) and find the non-inv. gain as a function of the lower voltage vi2: Vout2=f(vi2). However, in this case, we have to face a negative as well as a positive feedback loop. Hence, the total feedback factor Hf again must be calculated in two sepate steps: Hf=Hf1+Hf2 (sum of both feedback factors, one of which must have a negative sign).

(3) Vout=Vout1+Vout2 with V1=Vi1-Vi2

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.