0
\$\begingroup\$

I'm trying to connect 32 I²C "root of trust" NXP A71CH devices.

  • I'm thinking about a good way that does that, I mean what kind of communication should I use?
  • A digital multiplexer that selects a device? but based on what?
  • switching on the VDD source? but that needs reinitialization of the device and that takes time.
\$\endgroup\$
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Why are you needing 32 of those? They only seem to have 2 addresses so you would need to have at least 16 addressable bus segments. \$\endgroup\$ – r_ahlskog Jun 7 at 11:12
  • \$\begingroup\$ @r_ahlskog it's a requirment for a project. which bus do you recommend to use ? \$\endgroup\$ – Andre Jun 7 at 11:22
3
\$\begingroup\$

Really short: I²C with a bus multiplexer; this is a common problem and it's solved with a bus multiplexer.

However, seriously, the point of having a root of trust is having one root of trust, not 32; hence, your project requirements make me suspect you're either building a test rig for these devices, or you're testing a device that is supposed to work with one of these devices, or you've misunderstood your project requirements.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I concur with your doubts about the need for 32 such devices in a single system. I don't see any case where it makes sense, but maybe I'm not imaginative enough. \$\endgroup\$ – dim Jun 7 at 12:35
  • \$\begingroup\$ maybe they are doing a large testbed to figure out how much entropy the internal state of the device has after key generation or something like that. No idea. \$\endgroup\$ – Marcus Müller Jun 7 at 12:42
  • \$\begingroup\$ @MarcusMüller I would like to parallel the signing of transactions using those 32 devices, I have no solution at my hand right now with FAST speed to connect those 32devices in parallel, signing a transaction costs 7 seconds.. do you have a solution ? \$\endgroup\$ – Andre Jun 12 at 9:49
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Andre that's not what you use a root of trust for! You use that root to sign a key that you then use to sign the data. That key can be under control of your CPU. \$\endgroup\$ – Marcus Müller Jun 12 at 16:50

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.