1
\$\begingroup\$

What is the correct way to calculate \$C_F\$ of the transimpedance amplifier? Since I have two different documents, each has a different way to calculate it.

Base on these two documents:
1. Maxim
2. TI

On the first link Maxim, \$C_F\$ calculate by this equationenter image description here where \$f_{GBWP}\$ is 60% of unity gain bandwidth of opamp.

On the second link \$C_F<< 1/(2\pi R_ff_P)\$ for pole frequency, fp

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ CF may work out to pico-farads (or less), and doesn't include printed circuit board parasitic capacitance. CF may need a different value once a printed circuit board layout is finalized. \$\endgroup\$ – glen_geek Jun 10 at 14:59
  • \$\begingroup\$ Without correct CF you can choose correct opamp since you do not know the require gain bandwidth of opamp. Without correct CF the Vout will not be stable. \$\endgroup\$ – Shahreza Jun 10 at 15:03
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Can you draw the OpAmp open loop gain curve, and insert the Cdiode (or the source capacitance) with a feedback resistor, to show the extra phaseshift that causes peaking or oscillation? \$\endgroup\$ – analogsystemsrf Jun 10 at 15:16
0
\$\begingroup\$

The first thing to do is choose the bandwidth of the system, how fast of risetime/bandwidth do you need to be able to detect. Then select an opamp and capacitor.

The capacitor pole formed by the RC times constant cannot be higher frequency than the bandwidth of the op amp. That is what TI is telling you.

Maxim is telling you to pick an RC time constant that is lower than the GBWP.

Realize that parasitic inductance and capacitance of the board or wires or whatever you are building this circuit with will change this pole. So try and keep the traces short as possible, or calculate what the parasitics will do to the circuit.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ In a circuit that I am designing, I am connecting a sensor which generates a constant current base on the oxygen level, what should assume for frequency . but unfortunately, the manufacturer does not provide the Junction capacitance of the sensor. \$\endgroup\$ – Shahreza Jun 10 at 15:53
  • \$\begingroup\$ What is the bandwidth requirement of the system? How fast do you need to read the oxygen sensor? \$\endgroup\$ – Voltage Spike Jun 10 at 15:55
  • \$\begingroup\$ Not very fast maybe 1-10Khz. I tried to calculate the Cf base on 1.5Khz (RF= 10M) which is around 15pF, but this makes the Vout very noisy (ringing) until I change the capacitor to 0.680uF \$\endgroup\$ – Shahreza Jun 10 at 16:01
  • \$\begingroup\$ How do you have this circuit implemented? is it on a breadboard, PCB? \$\endgroup\$ – Voltage Spike Jun 10 at 16:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ Is on PCB I will attach a drawing to the question U7 is opamp, C17 is Feedback Capacitor, U4 is multiplexer which chooses gain Resistor and U12 is virtual Ground \$\endgroup\$ – Shahreza Jun 10 at 16:30
0
\$\begingroup\$

Both are correct.

The 1st is an example with equality (=) that includes Ci, (the junction capacitance of the photodiode in parallel with the input capacitance of the op-amp).

This is wise, with conservative 60% GBW for choosing \$f_p\$

The 2nd shows Cf "<< an upper limit" for reference (<< bigger limit than above.)

You need to update your question with datasheets, schematic and measurements.

This is how Honeywell does it. enter image description here

LINK

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Could you provide the link to this document, so I can take look at it \$\endgroup\$ – Shahreza Jun 10 at 19:15

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.