3
\$\begingroup\$

why is there 0.7V instead of 1.2V on the common emitter?

BJT

if you go through Q1 mesh : Ve = 0.5+Vbe = 1.2 instead of Ve = 0+Vbe = 0.7 from Q2.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Why do you think there should be 1.2 V? Please show your math for this. \$\endgroup\$ – AnalogKid Jun 15 at 0:22
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Q1,2 are in parallel, not series \$\endgroup\$ – Sunnyskyguy EE75 Jun 15 at 0:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ if you go through Q1 mesh : Ve = 0.5+Vbe = 1.2 instead of Ve = 0+Vbe = 0.7 from Q2 \$\endgroup\$ – Thiago Baldino Jun 15 at 0:52
  • \$\begingroup\$ Will Q1 or Q2 determine the voltage at the common emitters? Either transistor can determine that voltage. Which one wins the fight? \$\endgroup\$ – Peter Bennett Jun 15 at 1:09
  • \$\begingroup\$ Starting with the voltage on the Q2 base, what is the voltage at the two emitters? Now, what is the voltage across the Q1 base-emitter junction? Pay attention to which way the emitter arrow is pointing. \$\endgroup\$ – AnalogKid Jun 15 at 1:18
3
\$\begingroup\$

Your circuit is:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

You know that the emitter voltage for both BJTs is the same (they are tied together.) It follows from the schematic that \$\mid\: V_{\text{BE}_2}\mid\:\:=\:\:\mid V_{\text{BE}_1}\mid+500\:\text{mV}\$. You should be able to easily see that fact, directly from the schematic: \$V_{\text{B}_1}=V_{\text{B}_2}+500\:\text{mV}\$ and \$V_{\text{E}_1}=V_{\text{E}_2}\$.

Since you also know that for every \$60\:\text{mV}\$ difference in \$V_\text{BE}\$ there will be about \$10\times\$ the collector current, it follows that \$\frac{I_{\text{C}_2}}{I_{\text{C}_1}}\approx e^{^\frac{500\:\text{mV}}{26\:\text{mV}}}\approx 225\times10^{6}\$. In other words, \$Q_2\$ hogs all available current in \$R_1\$. What remains for \$Q_1\$ is in the small "parts per billion." (In short, nothing at all.)

From here, you have to only decide the approximate collector current for \$Q_2\$. If you temporarily assume that \$V_{\text{BE}_2}=700\:\text{mV}\$ then you find that \$I_{\text{C}_2}=\frac{5\:\text{V}-700\:\text{mV}}{1\:\text{k}\Omega}\approx 4.3\:\text{mA}\$. Since this value is fairly consistent with \$V_{\text{BE}_2}\approx 700\:\text{mV}\$ for most small-signal BJTs, you can reasonably rest on this computed value.

This assumption confirmed, the result is easily worked out.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

Redraw the diagram with Q1 and Q2 emitter- base paths replaced by diodes, D1 and D2. D1 has 0.5V applied to its cathode, and D2 has 0V applied to its cathode. A diode will drop 0.7V when it's on.

Given the above, only one on/off configuration of diode states, out of four possibilities, can occur.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.