# What's the difference between 74LVC1G74 and 74LVC2G74, finally?

I always thought that number before G in the part number is a number of identical gates in the chip. 1G08 is one AND gate, 2G08 is two AND gates in one package. Simple and understandable.

I am going to use LVC74 in my design, and was astonished to find out that 2G74 has one D-type flip flop in it. Fortunately, I did not buy it yet being totally ensured that it must have two DFFs in SSOP-8 package - 2 power pins, one data pin, one clock pin, and one output pin per trigger (no set, no clear, no inverted output).

I see this question on TI forum, and in my opinion answer is not clear, and seems to be wrong. I have compared 1G74 and 2G74 datasheets from Nexperia, and they appear the same with difference in document formatting.

WTF?

• ti.com/lit/ug/scbd152b/scbd152b.pdf - page 1-12. – Eugene Sh. Jul 2 '19 at 17:45
• .. but it looks like it doesn't help. According to it 2G should be double gate... – Eugene Sh. Jul 2 '19 at 17:51
• That's pretty weird, looking at those datasheets side by side. All the values appear the same, and there's just minor formatting differences. The 1G version existed for about a year before the 2G version, and it seems it existed like it is now for the last 15 years. I'm pretty sure you'd find the same chip in each of them. – W5VO Jul 2 '19 at 17:58
• The short, cynical, and opinion-based answer is "because people are involved". Ultimately, part numbers mean what the manufacturer wants them to, and violations of some "system" are going to happen. – TimWescott Jul 2 '19 at 18:01
• 1-2 = ? -1 ?... – Tony Stewart Sunnyskyguy EE75 Jul 2 '19 at 18:04