4
\$\begingroup\$

I read the Murata application notes on power supply decoupling and noise filtering. I guess it works great as advertisement because I now want to replace all the decoupling capacitors to my analog-related ICs with something like this :

Vcc - 10 uF three-terminal caps - NFE61 LC filter - 10 uF three-terminal caps

CF1, CF2 : NFM21 three-terminal capacitors

As a relative beginner in electronics, I'm fine with wasting money on this kind of overkill circuit, if I can just drop it in and reap the advertised benefits (less Vin noise, equivalent voltage buffering compared to MLCC decoupling caps).

Are there hidden downsides ?

For the sake of argument, Vcc is 3.3v from a LDO regulator (which takes 5v from dirty USB power). The analog parts of the circuit are: a CCD (IC2 on the schematics, TCD1304DG), an op amp (TL971) and an ADC (AD7380). The CCD is clocked in at 2 MHz, and there are 12-20 MHz SPI lines running on the board. I can more or less add this without disturbing the routing of the actual signals.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Band-Aids won't help when you have a broken leg. In other words: in general: using a patch without knowing how/why to use it and/or using a patch when you don't even now what you're suffering from doesn't sound as a good approach to me. The same applies to using the patch "apply a ground plane" because everyone says it is smart to do! \$\endgroup\$ – Huisman Jul 15 '19 at 9:54
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ There is a practical downside. You should only use parts from a sole-source vendor when there are no other good options. What if Murata decides that they aren't selling enough of these fancy parts to justify production, and they discontinue them ... costly redesign for you. \$\endgroup\$ – Mattman944 Jul 15 '19 at 9:59
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Mattman944 - see my comment about the mobile market. I used to worry about using high-value 0201 for the same reason. Not any more. Between Murata, TDK, Samsung and others the supply situation is good. \$\endgroup\$ – hacktastical Jul 15 '19 at 17:17
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Mattman944 has an excellent point. Recently had to do a >$1K lifetime buy of some Panasonic filters that were discontinued. Anything that's aimed at cell phones can't be counted on to be around for very long- the life cycles are measured in months not decades like industrial designs. \$\endgroup\$ – Spehro Pefhany Jul 16 '19 at 13:02
  • \$\begingroup\$ To make this work, you will need a Ground Plane. \$\endgroup\$ – analogsystemsrf Jul 17 '19 at 5:32
2
\$\begingroup\$

The big- value feedthroughs are useful to knock down high-frequency noise, so you could possibly get rid of the PI filter.

Next to the device, the big benefit of FT caps is their low ESL at a given value. You can replace multiple 0.1uF with one 1uF for example. So they can save space under a large device that needs a lot of bypass.

For these reasons FT caps are starting to show up in mobile phones as their main application. With that volume driving them it’s not such a concern sourcing them.

There is close cousin called the XY cap that has 4 terminals. It’s more expensive, is patented, and has relatively few sources. It’s debatable whether it’s better than the FT.

That all said, with the relatively low frequency you’re using you probably won’t see a benefit using FT caps. You can get by with conventional caps and a ferrite bead, like 4.7uf + 600 ohm + several 0.1uF. If improved PSRR is needed consider a separate LDO for the ADC.

|improve this answer|||||
\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.