0
\$\begingroup\$

enter image description here

Hi, this is from Razavi's Analog CMOS IC Design book (2nd edition) - Pg 49. He says that " We observe that the circuit provides a gain of about 3 in the input range of 0.4V to 0.6V"

But if you look at the graph, at the input of 0.5V, the output voltage is approx 0.55V. 0.55/0.5 = 1.1. Where is he getting the gain of 3?

\$\endgroup\$

2 Answers 2

4
\$\begingroup\$

The author is talking about small-signal gain, not large-signal. A small change in the input of 0.01V will change the output by about 0.03V. Although it's actually a negative gain here, as an increase in the input means a decrease in the output.

This is an estimate, though; just visually looking at the graph I would estimate a gain more around -2.5 or perhaps a bit more, probably lower magnitude than the 3 stated in the text.

\$\endgroup\$
5
  • \$\begingroup\$ Sorry, would you mind just explaining a bit more on differential gain. I usually thought that was in reference to differential amplifiers? How exactly is this differential gain? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 18, 2019 at 15:31
  • \$\begingroup\$ Sorry, I used the wrong term there. Early-morning sloppiness. Fixed it. \$\endgroup\$
    – Hearth
    Commented Aug 18, 2019 at 15:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ That makes more sense now. Small-Signal gain is the derivative of large signal gain (slope) in the linear region of an amp. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 18, 2019 at 17:03
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Hearth -- in some universe it's called differential gain. I knew what you meant, but from context, not from the word you used. \$\endgroup\$
    – TimWescott
    Commented Aug 18, 2019 at 17:11
  • \$\begingroup\$ @TimWescott Mornings tend to make me even worse with words than I normally am! \$\endgroup\$
    – Hearth
    Commented Aug 18, 2019 at 17:39
0
\$\begingroup\$

The gain comes from the small-signal gain, first you have to bias (put a dc voltage into) \$V_{in}\$ so that the \$|\frac{d}{dV_{in}}V_{out}|\$ is big, in a simpler way, use a \$V_{in}\$ that is located at a very steep position of the graph. In the example the author mentions

input in the range of 0.4V and 0.6V.

Lets use \$V_{in}=0.5V\$, at the very center of the range he suggests (that leads to \$V_{out} \approx 0.55)\$.

Now, if you have a signal added to that constant part, say, \$V_{in}=0.5+0.1\$, the output is \$V_{out} \approx 0.3 = 0.55 - 0.25\$.

From this, it can be determined that \$\frac{d}{dV_{in}}V_{out} \approx -0.25/0.1 = -2.5\$ if you bias \$V_{in}\$ with 0.5V. This gives you the gain for small signals applied to device while biased.

Remember that, by the first terms of the Taylor series $$f(x_0+\delta x) \approx f(x_0) + \frac{d}{dx}f(x_0)\delta x$$

So,

$$V_{out}(0.5+\delta x) \approx V_{out}(0.5) -2.5 \cdot \delta x = 0.55 -2.5 \delta x $$

Where is he getting the gain of 3?

The author approximated 2.5 to 3 and ignored the fact that this device is an inverting amplifier (has a negative gain of 2.5, which is almost 3).

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.