13
\$\begingroup\$

At a recent exam I had this very simple problem concerning Kirchhoffs Laws: problem statement

I am concerned with problem c

Now my understanding of this is:

I can combine both nodes, and since all currents in the node need to cancel out, \$i_c\$ should be 2A. Now my professor marked this problem as wrong and told me it should be 8A instead.

Am I doing something fundamentally wrong here?

Update: The professor reviewed the answer sheet because some other answers were wrong and did not mention the 8A again, and accepted the solution 🤷‍♂️

\$\endgroup\$
9
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ Unless I'm missing something I think you're correct with 2A. 0 = -(-1)-(Ic)+(4)-(3) -> Ic = 1+4-3 -> Ic = 2. Did your prof explain how he got 8A? \$\endgroup\$
    – brhans
    Commented Aug 21, 2019 at 17:03
  • 9
    \$\begingroup\$ The only easy way I get 8A for Ic is by changing the sign or direction on the 3A. \$\endgroup\$
    – brhans
    Commented Aug 21, 2019 at 17:08
  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ I like to write the equation with outflowing currents on the left and inflowing currents on the right. These must be equal to each other. In (c), I'd write: \$-1\:\text{A}+3\:\text{A}+i_c=4\:\text{A}\$ and then solve that for \$i_c=2\$. I've no idea what your professor is doing. \$\endgroup\$
    – jonk
    Commented Aug 21, 2019 at 17:08
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ I also must be blind because for me 2A is the correct answer. Or maybe it should be -3A? \$\endgroup\$
    – G36
    Commented Aug 21, 2019 at 17:09
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ how did you obtain the image? If this is what was on the questio. then professor is wrong but if the arrow 3A would flip he would be right. Maybe its sloppy drawing? \$\endgroup\$
    – joojaa
    Commented Aug 22, 2019 at 5:49

2 Answers 2

21
\$\begingroup\$

Professor is wrong. The correct answer is 2A. I solved it algebraically just as every one else, 4=3+Ic+-1, Ic = 2. A DC simulation in Spice yields 2A as as well.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Which version of Spice did you use, and what did the model look like? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 30, 2019 at 16:06
9
\$\begingroup\$

I agree, it should be 2A. I don't know how it could be 8A

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Easily: reverse the 3A current direction and you're about to get 4A+3A-(-1A). \$\endgroup\$
    – Crowley
    Commented Aug 22, 2019 at 12:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.