4
\$\begingroup\$

The V-I characteristics of MOSFET lies in the first and third quadrant. Therefore it should be passive device acc to me. But I have read that it is an active device. Can somebody tell what is wrong here or what am I missing?

Because for passive elements \$P_{out}\$ should be less than \$P_{in}\$ which correspond to \$V_1 \cdot I_1 + V_2 \cdot I_2 > 0\$ for a two port network. For those devices whose V-I characteristics are in first and third quadrant this condition will always hold.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ "according to you", but you're wrong. Explain why you think that you can infer passiveness! \$\endgroup\$ – Marcus Müller Aug 24 at 12:42
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ (@MarcusMuller, from reading that angry comment, I reckon you're not feeling passive :-) ) \$\endgroup\$ – TonyM Aug 24 at 12:48
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ No, I'm active – like in actively upvoting sensible answers like yours, @TonyM ;) \$\endgroup\$ – Marcus Müller Aug 24 at 12:49
  • \$\begingroup\$ Because for passive elements Pout should be less than Pin which correspond to V1*I1 +V2*I2 >0 for a two port network. For those devices whose V-I characteristics are in first and third quadrant this condition will always hold. That is why I had a doubt \$\endgroup\$ – Pkmb Aug 24 at 12:57
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ That's crucial to your question, so I'm editing that to include the comment, @Pkmb \$\endgroup\$ – Marcus Müller Aug 24 at 13:28
13
\$\begingroup\$

You are mistaking two different notions of active device.

The notion you are referring to is the notion from circuit theory. In that discipline a passive resistive (a.k.a. memoryless) two-terminal device is a device whose V/I characteristic curve lies entirely in the 1st and 3rd quadrant. By contrast, an active device is simply defined as a device that is not passive.

That implies that \$P_{absorbed} = V \cdot I\$ in a passive device cannot be negative, hence the absorbed power is positive for all possible working conditions. For active devices, on the contrary, there are points on the curve where \$V \cdot I < 0\$, therefore the device actually sources power to the external circuit in those conditions.

Note that that definition also implies that the power source is the device itself.

Those definitions can be extended to multi-terminal devices and to non-memoryless devices, albeit in non-trivial ways.

In general electronics, however, an active component/device is a device that can amplify a signal. I.e. it can take power from an external source and "pump" it into an input signal (voltage/current/power) and make its amplitude bigger, hence delivering bigger power to the load.

The two notions can be reconciled somewhat by realizing that many active components (in the "electronics" sense) have a mathematical model that can be linearized and the resulting linear models contain active devices (in the circuit theory sense), usually dependent current or voltage sources.

Sometimes active components can have a V/I curve that has negative resistance regions. Here resistance is the differential resistance in that region, i.e. the derivative of the curve (negative slope, that is).

It can be shown that using those devices when biased in the negative resistance region can lead to an amplification of the signal and, when the model is linearized, it contains "circuit theory active devices".

For example a tunnel diode has a V/I curve with a negative slope trait that can be used to amplify signals (I used this example because it is a two-terminal device and can be described by a single V/I curve).

Another interesting electronic device which is usually not considered an active device (in the electronic sense) is a common photodiode. If there is some incident light on its PN junction, its V/I curve lies partially in the 2nd quadrant.

See the following pictures taken from that Wikipedia page and emphasized in yellow by me:

enter image description here

(Attribution: original image by Kennlinie_Photodiode_1.png: Gregor Hess (Ghe42)derivative work: Materialscientist (talk) - Kennlinie_Photodiode_1.png, CC BY-SA 3.0, Link )

If the photodiode is biased so that it's quiescent point lies in that 2nd quadrant region (in yellow), the photodiode is said to work in photovoltaic mode. In that case the power sourced to the external circuit actually comes, from an electrical standpoint, from the device itself (physically it is just a conversion from light's EM energy to electrical energy).

That's actually the same behavior of a "circuit-theory active device"! In fact, see the current generator \$I_{PH}\$ in the equivalent model (in yellow): that's the source of the generated power, from a circuit theory POV.

And that's how photovoltaic panels actually work (they basically are long arrays of photodiodes appropriately connected to an inverter).

\$\endgroup\$
3
\$\begingroup\$

It's an active device because it uses a power source to produce an output in typical operation. It's not just its input that's used to produce its output.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.