0
\$\begingroup\$

I am currently working with machines and when I try to understand their principles in-depth, specifically in machines, I got to know that EMF is induced because of any of the two reasons:

1) Time-varying magnetic field.

2) Spacial changes in the magnetic field.

It is said in sources I referred that in transformers the induced EMF is due to the time-varying magnetic field and in generator or motor, it is due to spacial variation in the magnetic field.

I did not get why in generators or motor the field is spatially varying. The magnetic field there also varies with respect to time because of sinusoidal current flowing through them?

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ An AC generator does not require a time-alternating magnetic field source. \$\endgroup\$ – Andy aka Sep 26 at 13:57
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes, I accept that the conductor is rotated in the Spatially varied magnetic field in generators but in Induction motor the magnetic fields are altering with respect to the time when a particular point is considered but why do we say the magnetic field is only spaceially varied in such a case? \$\endgroup\$ – VKJ Sep 26 at 14:01
  • \$\begingroup\$ Case 2 is not really different from case 1. The point is that a wire loop will experience induced EMF if a magnetic field flows through the loop and that magnetic field changes with time. The change could be due to motion or due to change in magnetic field strength. \$\endgroup\$ – mkeith Sep 26 at 23:55
0
\$\begingroup\$

The field is spatially varying because the element generating the field is physically rotating relative to the armature. On many generators, the field is produced by a winding on the rotor, fed either by slip rings or an exciter generator on the same shaft, which is typically rectified so that the field is fed a DC current. This minimizes the iron losses in the rotor.

There's no reason that the field can't be both time and spatially varying. On an alternator, or a dynamo, that is producing a DC output via a bridge rectifier, you could feed an AC current through the field, and the armature output would be modulated by the alternating flux level. If you wanted to generate a synchronous AC output you would need a constant field, or you'd see a phase reversal at the output when the field reversed.

Universal motors, commonly used in small appliances and power tools, have an alternating field, and since the current supplied to the armature is in phase with the field (since they are connected in series), the product - torque at the shaft, is always in the same direction. They can't reasonably be used as AC generators, though.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

In a three phase induction motor, the three time varying, stator currents produce a rotating magnetic field that is only spatially varying. There is one spatially varying field per pair of stator poles. Each pair of rotor poles is formed by a group of three phase-windings.

Each stator field moving across the rotor conductors produces a rotor field that is only spatially varying. The rotor field rotates synchronously with the stator field, but displaced at an angle that is determined by the torque produced in response to the opposing load torque.

The image below may make it easier to visualize how three phase sinusoidal currents can create a rotating magnetic magnetic field with an amplitude that does not vary with time. For three times, (a), (b) and (c) the constituent and resultant flux vectors are shown for a simplified stator that is wound with three single-turn coils. The coils carry the currents with the corresponding times marked.

enter image description here

Image adapted from Fitzgerald, Kingsley, Umans, Electric Machinery, 4th ed.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ I can not get the mental picture you are referring to. \$\endgroup\$ – VKJ Sep 26 at 17:04
  • \$\begingroup\$ @VKJ See addition to answer. \$\endgroup\$ – Charles Cowie Sep 26 at 22:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ The resultant magnetic field is rotating.Why can't I say that rotation of magnetic field is both spacial and time variation?With respect to what we conclude it is only spatial variation? \$\endgroup\$ – VKJ Sep 27 at 1:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ You can see that the amplitude of the flux is (3/2)Fmax for each of the three angles shown. Using trigonometry, it can be shown that the flux amplitude has the same value for any angle of rotation. Thus, there is no time variation, only angular spatial variation. \$\endgroup\$ – Charles Cowie Sep 27 at 3:25
  • \$\begingroup\$ At a particular point in space there is only time variation of Field. Is that wrong? \$\endgroup\$ – VKJ Sep 27 at 3:36

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.