0
\$\begingroup\$

How can I find the transfer function H(s) of the following circuit by using the nodal analysis?

enter image description here

My thoughts woulb be:

the equation for the node \$ i_1 = i_1 + i_3 \$

\$ i_1 = \frac{U_e - U_1}{R_1} \$

\$ i_2 = \frac{U_1-U_2}{X_{c1}}\$

\$ i_3 = \frac{U_1 - U_a}{X_{c2}} \$

I expressed \$ U_2 \$ using the voltage divider

\$ U_2 = U_1\cdot\frac{X_{c1}}{X_{c1}R_2} \$

My idea was to express \$U_1\$ and \$U_1\$ set it all in the initial node equation \$ i_1 = i_1 + i_3 \$ and from that i might be able to derive the transfer function \$ \frac{U_a}{U_e} \$. But I don't know how to express \$ U_1 \$.

Accroding to some websites this is what the transfer function looks like for that typs of filters:

\$ \frac{U_{out}}{U_{in}} = \frac{\frac{1}{R_1C_1R_2C_2}}{s^2 + s(\frac{1}{R_2C_2} + \frac{1}{R_1C_2}) + \frac{1}{R_1C_1R_2C_2} } \$

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ I assume i1 = i2 + i3. \$\endgroup\$ – hatsunearu Sep 29 '19 at 19:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ Also if you want to find voltages, you generally express all currents in terms of voltages and you end up with an equation of voltage variables and have no current variables (node voltage method). \$\endgroup\$ – hatsunearu Sep 29 '19 at 19:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ \$i_2\$ is the current through R2, but you are making it dependent on \$X_{C1}\$. Why? \$\endgroup\$ – TimWescott Sep 29 '19 at 19:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ Have a look here (electronics.stackexchange.com/questions/439745/…) and see how the fast analytical circuits techniques or FACTs can get you the transfer function in a record time without using nodal analysis. \$\endgroup\$ – Verbal Kint Sep 29 '19 at 20:44
1
\$\begingroup\$

Well, we have the following circuit:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

Using KCL, we can write:

$$ \begin{cases} \text{I}_{\text{R}_1}+\text{I}_{\text{C}_2}=\text{I}_{\text{R}_2}\\ \\ \text{I}_{\text{R}_2}=\text{I}_{\text{C}_1} \end{cases}\tag1 $$

Using KVL, we can write:

$$ \begin{cases} \text{I}_{\text{R}_1}=\frac{\text{V}_\text{in}-\text{V}_1}{\text{R}_1}\\ \\ \text{I}_{\text{R}_2}=\frac{\text{V}_1-\text{V}_+}{\text{R}_2}\\ \\ \text{I}_{\text{C}_1}=\frac{\text{V}_+}{\left(\frac{1}{\text{sC}_1}\right)}=\text{V}_+\cdot\text{sC}_1\\ \\ \text{I}_{\text{C}_2}=\frac{\text{V}_--\text{V}_1}{\left(\frac{1}{\text{sC}_2}\right)}=\left(\text{V}_--\text{V}_1\right)\cdot\text{sC}_2=\left(\text{V}_\text{out}-\text{V}_1\right)\cdot\text{sC}_2 \end{cases}\tag2 $$

Substituting \$(2)\$ into \$(1)\$, we get:

$$ \begin{cases} \frac{\text{V}_\text{in}-\text{V}_1}{\text{R}_1}+\left(\text{V}_\text{out}-\text{V}_1\right)\cdot\text{sC}_2=\frac{\text{V}_1-\text{V}_+}{\text{R}_2}\\ \\ \frac{\text{V}_1-\text{V}_+}{\text{R}_2}=\text{V}_+\cdot\text{sC}_1 \end{cases}\tag3 $$

Now, in the ideal opamp circuit, we know that \$\text{V}_+=\text{V}_-=\text{V}_\text{out}\$. So we get:

$$ \begin{cases} \frac{\text{V}_\text{in}-\text{V}_1}{\text{R}_1}+\left(\text{V}_\text{out}-\text{V}_1\right)\cdot\text{sC}_2=\frac{\text{V}_1-\text{V}_\text{out}}{\text{R}_2}\\ \\ \frac{\text{V}_1-\text{V}_\text{out}}{\text{R}_2}=\text{V}_\text{out}\cdot\text{sC}_1 \end{cases}\tag4 $$

So, we get:

$$\mathcal{H}\left(\text{s}\right):=\frac{\text{V}_\text{out}\left(\text{s}\right)}{\text{V}_\text{in}\left(\text{s}\right)}=\frac{1}{\text{R}_1\text{R}_2\text{C}_1\text{C}_2\text{s}^2+\text{C}_1\left(\text{R}_1+\text{R}_2\right)\text{s}+1}\tag5$$

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.