1
\$\begingroup\$

I am a bit confused about deciding which implicants to turn into prime. If I group implicants 1 and 2 into a bigger implicant, can I group implicants 2 and 3 as well?

For example, if I have the K-map below, I can find implicants as follows: K-map

There are three options:

  1. Group the red and orange into a bigger implicant.

  2. Group the red and green into a bigger implicant.

  3. Do both (1) and (2), resulting in two overlapping implicants.

Do I choose only one option or do all of them?

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Try all three and see which produces the smallest simplest result. \$\endgroup\$
    – user16324
    Commented Oct 2, 2019 at 14:20

1 Answer 1

2
\$\begingroup\$

In terms of number of operators needed (inverter, or, and) it does not matter.

However, in a real life situation, it can depend on (just summing up things coming in my mind):

  • Some operator (ICs/logic/transistors (on an IC) can be more costlier or more space consuming than others, prefering one type of operator above another
  • Some operator can be faster than another, prefering the faster type above the other
  • Some operator ICs come in multipliers of 2, 4 or 8 and having an exact (or almost) number of one type of operator can favor into another. Example: if you can chose between 5 not operators and 10 or operators, and an each IC has 8 operators, you need three. But if you can have a different formula that has e.g. 7 not operators and 8 or operators, you need only 2 ICs.
\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.