2
\$\begingroup\$

I am working with an existing schematic which has bidirectional TVS surge protection, laid out like this:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

The TVS diodes are discrete and have different breakdown voltages. To me, the above configuration makes less sense than:

schematic

simulate this circuit

These connections make more sense since there is no 'extra' 0.7V (or whatever the forward drop is for the diode) added to the breakdown voltage of the reverse-biased diode, which someone may forget.

Is there any particular reason for putting two discrete TVS diodes in 'series', like the above schematic rather than 'parallel'?

\$\endgroup\$
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Putting them parallel and biased as drawn makes one TVS conduct if the voltage over the pair is either over 0.7 V or less than -0.7 V. You could just as well use normal diodes. \$\endgroup\$ – jms Oct 23 at 17:28
4
\$\begingroup\$

You are close in the way that you are thinking but you didn't follow that path all the way to the end.

Each uni-polar TVS looks like a standard silicon diode in the forward direction and like a very high-power Zener diode in the reverse direction.

As you said - the reverse-series connection has a rated clamping voltage of the breakdown voltage plus one diode drop. That's exactly correct.

Now examine what happens when you connect the uni-polar TVS devices in reverse-parallel. The devices now look to be standard silicon diodes connected in reverse-parallel. The voltage drop in each direction is now that of a forward-biased silicon diode, or about 0.7 Vdc.

\$\endgroup\$
5
\$\begingroup\$

In the anti-parallel configuration of your second diagram, one of the diodes will conduct whenever the source voltage exceeds its forward threshold voltage (0.6 V or so). This is usually not what you want. The reverse breakdown voltage, which is the whole point of a TVS, won't even come into it.

\$\endgroup\$
-2
\$\begingroup\$

Even if you match the breakover voltage between series and parallel, the amount of power dissipated varies when the diodes sink current:

enter image description here
Source: https://aerospacepal.com/tvs-diode-series-vs-parallel/

The series configuration is better for power dissipation, because of even power loading. In the parallel configuration, the diodes do no share current. In the series the current is equal.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ I think that you missed the point of the original question. The OP is asking why we don't connect the TVS devices in reverse-parallel rather than reverse-series. \$\endgroup\$ – Dwayne Reid Oct 23 at 17:29
  • \$\begingroup\$ Most TVS are bidirectional anyway so I don't think so \$\endgroup\$ – Voltage Spike Oct 23 at 17:38
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The family of TVS devices that we use come in two distinct flavors: "A" and "CA" versions. The "A" devices are uni-polar and the "CA" devices are bipolar. Eg. 1.5KE18A is uni-polar and 1.5KE18CA is bipolar. The specific part being chosen depends on the circuit requirements. \$\endgroup\$ – Dwayne Reid Oct 23 at 21:33

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.