0
\$\begingroup\$

I'm designing a smart socket that will route 240V AC Live and Neutral to a voltage regulator and also to a relay that will control the current flow. Due to the limited space, it will be easier to route the live wire on the top layer and neutral on the bottom layer as shown in the diagram below where the red track is AC Live and blue is AC Neutral. enter image description here

The PCB is two layers with a thickness of 1.6mm. Will there be any problem routing it this way? Will it create a voltage potential or capacitance of any type? Secondly, the relay can handle up to 5A, hence the tracks should be able to handle 5A too. Based on an online PCB trace calculator, the trace must have a width of 2.77mm which is quite hard to fit in the limited space. If I leave the traces to be exposed copper, can I then reduce the trace width?

[EDITED] This is the alternate PCB layout where it is on a single layer but as you can see it increases the track length quite significantly. enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ It looks like you're planning on etching away all copper that isn't at trace. Don't do that. It's wasteful of etchant. Instead, use copper pours and connect them to ground. That also means that instead of your traces, you can make them into large pour areas to dissipate heat if there's nothing around the otherwise thin trace that it would encroach upon. \$\endgroup\$ – DKNguyen Oct 26 '19 at 16:57
  • \$\begingroup\$ I'm actually using a PCB manufacturer to manufacturer the PCB where the cost of the copper will be the same regardless. Anyhow, I will be adding copper pours around it to increase the width but I'm concern if they get too close a spark may happen. \$\endgroup\$ – Max Oct 27 '19 at 11:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ I'm talking from a larger view than just your wallet. It produces more chemical waste and takes longer to etch on their end. \$\endgroup\$ – DKNguyen Oct 27 '19 at 17:55
0
\$\begingroup\$

I see still you can route such that there is no overlap.Also, you can keep P1 and P2 back to back such that P & N are next to each other and trace lengths can be minimum and width can be more.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes it is possible to route with no overlap as shown in the edited version but this can increase the length quite significantly. I can place P1 and P2 back to back but they are terminals blocks and placing them in that manner can make it hard for wiring later on. \$\endgroup\$ – Max Oct 27 '19 at 11:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.