31
\$\begingroup\$

In a distribution grid, what is the speed of

  • energy
  • signal

Is it strictly the same?

And how is synchronisation achieved? Is an electric grid essentially an orchestra where everyone is the chief and gives the beat to everyone?

\$\endgroup\$
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Electric current can give you an idea of how fast electricity may travel. The speed varies on the medium of which the electron travels. Hydron Colliders make protons travel at an insane amount of speed. \$\endgroup\$ – KingDuken Oct 28 at 2:33
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Related / cross-site near-duplicate: Speed of light vs speed of electricity - the speed of electricity in wires is a transmission-line effect which we can model with series inductance and parallel capacitance per unit length. \$\endgroup\$ – Peter Cordes Oct 29 at 2:07
  • 7
    \$\begingroup\$ Isn't any research required? At the very least why this is not a duplicate? \$\endgroup\$ – Peter Mortensen Oct 29 at 6:15
  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ Why this question has so many votes...so broad and overrated \$\endgroup\$ – Mitu Raj Oct 29 at 12:34
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ Perhaps people are interested in the answer. \$\endgroup\$ – Tim Nevins Oct 29 at 20:25
29
\$\begingroup\$

For most of the copper wire and traces you see, about 60% the speed of light in a vacuum. The energy is the signal so they are the same.

The speed of electrons is much slower...slower than walking pace. The electrons aren't moving to and from the powerplant 60 times per second.

Think the difference between the speed of sound and the wind. The wave (energy) moves through the medium much faster than the medium itself.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ It doesn’t make sense to talk about the speed of electricity in copper. The wave travels around the conductor in the medium surrounding the conductor. Hence there is a difference between copper in FR4 and copper in vacuum. In fact, the actual speed inside the conductor is very frequency dependent, i.e. it is proportional to the square root of the frequency. \$\endgroup\$ – user110971 Oct 28 at 3:07
  • 36
    \$\begingroup\$ About the speed of electrons being slower, an analogy: Think of a tube that's filled with marbles. If I push a new marble in one end, a marble comes out the other end pretty much simultaneously. The signal (= marble in becomes marble out) is near instant, but the particular electron (= marble) that you pushed in the tube hasn't actually reached the end of the tube yet. The marbles in the tube "pass the message" along faster than the marbles themselves travel. The same is true of electrons. \$\endgroup\$ – Flater Oct 28 at 12:27
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ @Loduwijk When a signal travels along a conductor it actually travels in the space around the conductor as electromagnetic waves. However it also propagates perpendicularly inside the conductor but is attenuated as it travels in the conductor. The speed in the conductor is the frequency dependent part. But when we say the speed of the signal we mean how fast the signal gets from one end of the conductor to the other. So there are two speeds. Have a look at my answer to a similar question for more information electronics.stackexchange.com/a/462535/110971 \$\endgroup\$ – user110971 Oct 28 at 18:08
  • 22
    \$\begingroup\$ I work for a power company in Oregon. We have a 1Mvdc line to southern California that's been there since (I believe) the 60's. I asked about how fast electrons travel and was told that the first electrons pushed into the wire in the 60's aren't in California yet. I know that' super inexact but it made an impact. \$\endgroup\$ – Bill K Oct 28 at 21:48
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @BillK That reminds me of how some of the light from the sun might be millions of years old because there is so much matter inside the sun that the photons collide with it all as they make their way out towards the surface. \$\endgroup\$ – DKNguyen Oct 28 at 21:51
22
\$\begingroup\$

(added) The wave speed ratio of electricity v/c is limited by the relative permetivvity, \$ε_r\$ of insulation around the conductor for the speed, v relative to speed of light, c in a vacuum. It is also limited by the relative magnetic permeability, \$\mu _r\$ in the wire or closely coupled around it, as this would occur in magnetic components.


\$v/c = 1/\sqrt{\mu_r \varepsilon_r}\$ has nothing to do with the grid conductors and only the insulation or relative dielectric constant.

The relative constant is also called Dk for most low Dk plastics is ~ 2.3 used give a velocity ratio of 2/3 or 66% such as coaxial cable. Higher is better. I am not saying all grid coax, just most coax in general.

Much of the local distribution grid is grounded coaxial cable to reduce radio noise and lightning interference, which has insulation.

The bare wire is the nearly the same speed as free space for the speed of light in a vacuum.

how is synchronization achieved?

The grid length is fixed and static and thus easy to equalize between sources at the connection point by phase-shifting methods unless some passive power factor correction is requested.

The bigger issue is the dynamic power factor correction and load balancing where the phase-correction is dynamically changing and must be balanced to provide real power that is authorized by a higher authority with trade deals that are pre-negotiated in complex algorithms based on supply & Demand during peak and off-peak hours of the day.

You can search for books on this subject or short stories, but it is beyond the scope of your question and this forum.

Is an electric grid essentially an orchestra where everyone is the conductor and gives the beat to everyone?

The conductor is the government or independent organization that controls the cesium-time coordinated synchronization of the grid in each country.

The musicians are the generators of power on the grid.

There is also a new HVDC microgrid, developed in Toronto and co-owned by a close relative of mine that avoids these sync-issues for suppliers of alternative energy sources such as PV, & Windpower.

Here is what Wiki says, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synchronization_(alternating_current)

Non-technical description.

The actual flow is slower than a water bucket-brigade, yet faster than a stadium circular arm-wave. Imagine electrons spinning in stationary motion, but in a stimulated massless cascaded-wave at the speed of light by cascaded connections, where only the surrounding insulation Dk can slow down the absolute speed of c to v.

Technically, Speed is referred to as the Propagation velocity in a transmission line following Telegrapher's Equations.

You can play with one simulation here with mismatched impedances.

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I hear that bare speed on a copper wire is still two thirds of light. Do you have a reference for your bare speed? \$\endgroup\$ – toolforger Oct 29 at 7:43
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ You hear wrong. \$\endgroup\$ – Tony Stewart Sunnyskyguy EE75 Oct 29 at 8:20
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Do you understand the principles and equation above? \$\endgroup\$ – Tony Stewart Sunnyskyguy EE75 Oct 29 at 8:35
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ I do understand the equation, I just don't know enough details to determine whether it is applied correctly. However, I did read that signal velocity on copper wire is roughly 1/3 or lightspeed (in the context of microelectronics), you claim that it is roughly c, I don't know where the difference is so a reference would help me (your last comment about "secret" is quite the opposite of helpful, I have to say). \$\endgroup\$ – toolforger Oct 29 at 12:55
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @toolforger another useful comment is this one and another answer linked there. "When a signal travels along a conductor it actually travels in the space around the conductor as electromagnetic waves. ..." \$\endgroup\$ – crasic Oct 30 at 6:17
13
\$\begingroup\$

You need to separate two slightly different concepts.

There is the electron drift velocity which is the speed at which the charge carriers in the wire move due to the electric field (and is basically negligible, think mm/s) and the propagation velocity of the EM wave between the conductors which is a significant fraction of lightspeed.

It is the em wave that carries the energy.

Grids are generally large enough that there is significant phase shift across the grid, but that really does not matter because you synchronise a generator the the local grid connection before putting it on line.

The modern way is with all sorts of digital doings, but it can be done with a big three phase switch, a set of suitable light bulbs and a hand throttle. You wire the bulbs across the big switch so they pulse as the grid and generator slip into and out of phase sync, trim the throttle to get the pulsing to become very slow, then just as the lights fade out you throw the switch.

Closing the switch puts the machine on line and locks it in sync with the grid, if it was slightly slow it will motor (absorbing power from the grid) to get up to speed, if slightly fast it will generate until the speed matches the grid. You want to be close before you close the contactor because the currents that can flow if you are not close will cause forces that can throw the generator off its mountings (Even if it is a power station generator).

Note that at this point the machine is connected to the grid, spinning in sync and at the same SPEED as ALL the other generators on the grid, but probably has the throttle only open sufficiently to make up for friction, to make power you now need to open the throttle.

Now assuming any given generator is a small part of the grid, what happens when you throttle up is interesting, because the speed does not change (modulo any increase in grid frequency which impacts all generating stations equally), but you start pouring torque into trying to accelerate the whole grid (raise its frequency).

If you image a rotating reference plane defined by the magnetic field from the grid connected stator coils then at idle the rotor is aligned with that field so there is no torque between them. When you open the throttles the rotor eventually settles to a new angle relative to the rotating field such that the torque from the interaction of the fields exactly matches the torque from your drive. The rotor leads on the field when generating, and lags when motoring.

\$\endgroup\$
  • 16
    \$\begingroup\$ My father once told me that when he was a student he got to visit a power plant when they phased it in. This was in Russia, and they didn't really "phase" it in so much as just force the plant to synchronize by slamming a makeshift switch (huge bar of copper) in place (a slab of copper with a rough bar shaped hole in it) with explosives. He told me the power lines were making unearthly noises, and the power plant it self was screeching in a most terrifying cacophony. But it all quieted down over the course of half a minute. Thats how not to do it. \$\endgroup\$ – Stian Yttervik Oct 28 at 13:26
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ @StianYttervik butttt it worked right? lol Utterly practical. \$\endgroup\$ – DKNguyen Oct 28 at 14:23
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Dknguyen the story doesn't say, but I would think so. If it was today, probably every fine electronic device on the kola peninsula would be fritzed and the respective houses on fire \$\endgroup\$ – Stian Yttervik Oct 28 at 16:41
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Fascinating post, thanks for that ! \$\endgroup\$ – Fattie Oct 29 at 16:53
11
\$\begingroup\$

Apart from the actual electric grid part of the question, I think you might have a confusion about the speed of electrons and the drift velocity.

What I'm saying is, when you say speed of electricity, I think you mean the speed of current, which is pretty fast, or the speed of electrons, which is also pretty fast, or the drift, which is pretty slow. (Pretty fast means near c, pretty slow can mean as slow as a snail)

\$\endgroup\$
3
\$\begingroup\$

And how is synchronisation achieved? Is an electric grid essentially an orchestra where everyone is the chief and gives the beat to everyone?

For the second part of your question, check out ANSI type 25 relays, aka 'sync check' relays.

To synchronize a generator to the bus, you need to match three things: voltage magnitude, voltage phase, and voltage frequency.

An auto-synchronizing relay (25A) works by comparing the magnitude, phase, frequency of the generator output and the bus and then a) sending control signals to the prime mover (generator) to increase or decrease fuel feed to speed or slow the shaft rotation, which allows it to match both the generator phase and the frequency to the bus; and b) sending signals to the generator's voltage regulator to adjust field current to match the generator output voltage to within some percentage of the bus voltage.

A basic sync check (25) relay works by simply signalling when the above conditions are met.

Once the conditions are met, automated switchgear or a human operator can close the breaker.

If you don't properly sync, you can put incredible stress on the prime mover and windings. For example, if you are out of phase when you try to close the breaker, you're essentially dead-shorting all three generator phases at a high voltage to all three bus phases at a low voltage. As the magnetic fields try to lock, the shaft twists and the unit is potentially damaged.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.