I noticed that a lot of designs of phase-shift oscillators use a sequence of high-pass filters to get the phase-shift. Is there any reason why one couldn't use three low pass filters instead? I realize that the maximum phase-shift for a single high-pass filter is +90 and for a low-pass filter -90. Does this difference influence the design?

  • \$\begingroup\$ Think again, what is the criteria for oscillation using the Barkhausen Criteria? Then what is the criteria to make it a stable Sine wave wave output? Then what is the phase shift in each RC with 3 stages. \$\endgroup\$ Nov 11, 2019 at 5:19
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ the high-pass filters perform DC_blocking, thus a simple single transistor Common_emitter amplifier provides the power gain. \$\endgroup\$ Nov 11, 2019 at 5:20
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Here is one benefit of the high-pass version (assuming an opamp) : The resistor of the last C-R element can fulfill two tasks at the same time: It works (a) as an input resistor Rx as part of the inverting amplifier (gain: - Ry/Rx) and (b) as a grounded R (virtual ground) as required for a simple C-R highpass stage. This simplyfies the design of the whole oscillator. In contrast, when we are using a three-stage lowpass, the resistor Rx (as part of the amplifier) works as an - unwanted - load for the last R-C stage. \$\endgroup\$
    – LvW
    Nov 11, 2019 at 8:41
  • \$\begingroup\$ @TonyStewartSunnyskyguyEE75 to answer your question: "what is the phase shift in each RC with 3 stages" Up to 90 degrees for each one, so a max of 270. At a 45-degree shift, both are equivalent in terms of amplitude changes. Hence I was wondering if there was any advantage to one or the other. I've seen both designs but the high-pass one seems to dominate. Thinking more about it I wonder whether it because it's easier to get minimal amplitude change with a high-pass filter at larger frequency shifts. A low pass filter to exceed 180-degrees would result in a fairly reduced amplitude. \$\endgroup\$
    – rhody
    Nov 11, 2019 at 18:32
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Tony Stewart Sunnyskyguy EE75 I liked that simulation you cited in your response. I don't think I was aware of that site. \$\endgroup\$
    – rhody
    Nov 11, 2019 at 20:28


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.