2
\$\begingroup\$

I'm looking for an article or specification that explains how a GSM device (ME) decides which tower/base stations (BTS) it should connect to.

I'm looking for info specifically on the registration phase and NOT the hand-over phase.

From my understanding, and this is just a very basic explanation for a complex process, the ME scans for nearby towers (typically only the ones from its designated MNO). During this process it will gather info about these towers such as signal strength. Once the scanning process has completed, it will try an attached to the tower with the highest signal strength.

I will appreciate your comments, but I really need a reliable or at least somewhat reliable source as a reference. Unfortunately a forum post will not be sufficient.

Anyone out there knows where I can find this info?

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because it is about network protocols rather than electrical engineering, and because it is a request to find an external resource, both reasons that make it outside the mission of this site. \$\endgroup\$ – Chris Stratton Nov 11 '19 at 21:46
  • \$\begingroup\$ Well Chris. I'm an electronic engineer designing a new product that uses GSM technology. I need to find info on this specific topic as a case study before I can proceed with the hardware. Is this not electronic engineering? Is a forum not a central point for people to share knowledge and information? Irrespective whether it requires info from an external resource? A community contributing information to a single source, irrespective of the origin of the information? \$\endgroup\$ – bluscape Nov 11 '19 at 21:56
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Stack exchange sites are not forums. Each has very specific, and very intentionally narrow mission. Requests for help in finding external resources are specifically prohibited. \$\endgroup\$ – Chris Stratton Nov 11 '19 at 21:57
  • \$\begingroup\$ If you're designing a new GSM modem from scratch, that's an oddly specific piece of information to be asking for. Wouldn't that be part of the more general over-the-air-interface specification that your product will be tested against before it can be type-accepted by whatever governing body regulates GSM communication in your country? Why are you focusing on that issue in particular? \$\endgroup\$ – Dave Tweed Nov 11 '19 at 23:17
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I'm very aware of lifespan 2G and 3G, but in North Africa it is still VERY popular and therefore I have to make provision for it.Hence the original question. Also an extremely cost sensitive market and with 2G we can achieve that. But that is also why we make provision for 4G. \$\endgroup\$ – bluscape Nov 12 '19 at 20:39
1
\$\begingroup\$

Thanks for reopening the question.

This is not something that you would encounter on a regular basis but I've faced this same question several times over the past 10 years. Especially when you place GSM equipment on a high site (mountain) where there are two or more, non-synchronised GSM cell's visible. This will result in incorrect cell hand-over and unnecessary re-registration attempts. This will result in delayed data transmissions which I cannot afford.

The question:

I needed to determine what control and/or how much control I have over the GSM registration process, I needed to know who decides how a GSM device is registered on a GSM network, the network or the device. More specifically how it is decided to which tower (base station) a device shall attach. I already had the answer but had to confirm it through a reliable resource such as the ETSI GSM documentation. The other alternative was to fire up a couple development kits and test it but I'd be more at ease if I could verify it through the GSM standards documentation. There is a large library of ETSI GSM documents and if you do not know the exact terminology, it can take some time to get to the information you need. I therefore came here for assistance with the hope that someone with more knowledge on this topic could assist.

The source of the answer:

I found the answer in these two standards:

ETSI TS 125 304 - User Equipment (UE) procedures in idle mode and procedures for cell reselection in connected mode

Excerpt:

"When a UE is switched on, a public land mobile network (PLMN) is selected and the UE searches for a suitable cell of this PLMN to camp on."

ETSI TS 100 930 - Functions related to Mobile Station (MS) in idle mode and group receive mode

Excerpt:

"Initially, the MS looks for a cell which satisfies these 5 constraints ("suitable cell") by checking cells in descending order of received signal strength. If a suitable cell is found, the MS camps on it and performs any registration necessary."

The answer:

Like I said before, I already had the answer but had to confirm it. Mostly because we are considering new technology.

Registered or is unregistered, a GSM device device will continiously scan the surroundings for available Base Transceiver Stations (BTS)/Cells. If I remember correctly, this is done every 5 seconds. As long as it is powered, the radio is enabled and it has a functional SIM. It will keep a list of these Cell's and when asked to register, it will try and register to the Cell with the highest signal strength. Whether it will be allowed to communicate further through this cell, will be determined by the network during the authentication process. So the Mobile Network Operator (MNO) will not enforce the cell to which a device may try and register but it will enforce whether is allowed to further communicate through this cell. The control of the registration is in my hands.

I've always used AT+COPS to control my registration to a specific Mobile Network Operator (MNO). With AT+COPS=0, the registration is automatic and with AT+COPS=1 I can set the specific operator.

In addition to AT+COPS, you can also define to which BTS/Cell you want to connect, by populating the preferred cell list with the desired BTS/Cell information (LAC and Cell ID). The commands used to collect the surrounding cell info (MCC, MNC, LAC, CELLID, BCCH, etc.) and populating the preferred cell list, varies from GSM module manufacturers (or GSM chipsets). For Quectel you would use AT+QENG and for Cinterion you would use AT^SMONC and AT^SPCL.

Why the question:

In short:

We use different GSM technologies in different countries and different SIM's with different SIM profiles in different countries. Our application requires low latency data throughput (that includes the latency or delay introduced by network registration).

To avoid the delays introduced by network registration, which in general is about 60 seconds and more for low signal areas. I needed to confirm how much control I have over the registration process, such that I can select the correct GSM technology and SIM for the specific environment. So by collecting surrounding network information, I can make a decision (prior to registering) without having to try all the GSM technology and SIM combinations, which will result in an extremely long registration result. I hope this makes sense.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.