0
\$\begingroup\$

Suppose in a home, power factor drops to zero. It means that the circuit becomes purely inductive.

If the energy meter is connected at incoming power supply point,will the energy meter still keep on increasing? If yes, then where is this energy being consumed?

We know that reactive power keeps on oscillating between source and load, so in this case, how does the reactive power fits into picture?

\$\endgroup\$
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Short answer: it doesn't. \$\endgroup\$ – Hearth Nov 16 '19 at 3:38
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Hearth But if it records only energy dissipated in resistive components, what effect does pf improvement have on energy bills? \$\endgroup\$ – Sagar Upadhyay Nov 16 '19 at 3:57
  • \$\begingroup\$ @SagarUpadhyay For general consumers anyway, the power meters often will NOT measure energy returned back to the system. That will depend on the power company and customer situation, though. So there is no perfect answer. But for example, 20 years ago in my area ZERO homes had meters that would count returned energy. They only recorded delivered energy. Today, some meters do account for both directions because some home owners install solar or wind power and the power companies are gradually accommodating them. \$\endgroup\$ – jonk Nov 16 '19 at 7:38
1
\$\begingroup\$

If there is GENUINELY ZERO resistive energy then energy will not dissipate, an ideal energy meter will not increment and the ideal reactive components will maintain the situation indefinitely.

Then, you wake up.
In the "real world" there are NO genuinely reactive components.
Inductors can resistance (and some capacitance).
Capacitors have ESR (resistance) and some inductance.
Wires have the same.
The energy meter shunt is often resistive, and even if it uses a Hall sensor it will not be absolutely lossless.

In the very very "best" case, it may take a wee while for things to die down. But never anything like indefinitely. You can work out the order of time for yourself by looking at eg published capacitor ESR values and inductor resistance, and wiring resistance. These set a lower level on losses before you start to look at the other (usually) second order components.

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ modern over-sampled electronic power meters can easily monitor both the inphase (real) and quadrature (reactive) power flows. If the power company has an agreement with the user about reactive power maximums, then the customer pays. \$\endgroup\$ – analogsystemsrf Nov 16 '19 at 4:01
  • \$\begingroup\$ @analogsystemsrf I agree completely with your comment. I took him to be asking about energy dissipation and measurement - if the meter something other than dissipated energy (as in the case you note) then it may register something. || WHILE I HAVE YOU HERE :-) - This question which you commented on was closed and has now been reopened and has and answer from me and lots of history (now in chat). AFAIR you 1st suggested NTC self heating. You may wish to add input now it is reopened. \$\endgroup\$ – Russell McMahon Nov 16 '19 at 7:27
1
\$\begingroup\$

Please note there is a difference between power factor (PF) and displacement power factor (DPF)

PF is associated with the harmonic content while DPF is associated with the fundamental

DPF = cos(\$\Theta\$)

PF = \$\frac{DPF}{\sqrt{1+THD^2}}\$

why is this important? Because there are two scenarios where the real power can be zero.

1) Purely reactive load causing 90° phase shift between voltage and current

2) Purely harmonic current draw, causing no current draw at the fundemental.

colloquially, PF is used interchangeably with DPF more freely than it should be. In the scenario you are considering, the PF would equally the DPF as the THD = 0

What would happen? Well assuming you could acquire an ideal inductor and you had ideal cabling to your house, you would draw current equal to \$ \frac{V}{j\omega L} \$ while drawing no real power. This current could potentially be quite high.

Domestic billing is measured and charged in WATTS so you would theoretically not be charged anything. The grid and the generation however still need to source this current and this is where the problems are. Industry are charged in VA so every harmonic or DPF they draw, they must pay for since the generation and distribution must manage this.

If you or an industry complex did draw excessive DPF or PF there would eventually be a representative from the local electrical board to investigate (how quickly depends on how much disturbances since this impacts the generation, the distribution and everyone at the PCC)

In practice you cannot have an ideal inductor and thus there would be real power being pulled to feed the resistive element of the inductor and the cableing while also drawing (potentially) excessive current and DPF

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

Not only do all (non-superconducting) reactive devices have a non zero resistance, but also, any circuit of finite size (larger than a single electron) has a loop area, and will radiate EM energy. Both will heat up the universe, conserving all the added energy. Or something will melt.

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

In a reactive, oscillating circuit energy is dissipated by:

a) Resistance

b) Electromagnetic radiation

c) Gravitational radiation from the accelerating charges (negligible)

d) Changes in dimensions of components resulting in mechanical heat losses and sound

| improve this answer | |
\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.