1
\$\begingroup\$

I'm currently taking an MIT-OCW course, where it says that a system built from smaller combinational systems following the following compositional rules is combinational:

  1. Each component of the system must itself be a combinational device.

  2. Each input of each component must be connected a system input, or to exactly one output of another device, or to a constant voltage representing the value 0 or the value 1.

  3. The interconnected components cannot contain any directed cycles, i.e., paths through the system from its inputs to its outputs will only visit a particular component at most once.

However, it then states:

sys

is combinational.

However, it looks like C is connected to two outputs of other devices - to A and B. How is this then still combinational? In general, I don't understand the point of why it would only need to be connected to exactly one output of another device.

Apologies if this is the wrong StackExchange, wasn't sure where to ask this.

\$\endgroup\$
0

1 Answer 1

2
\$\begingroup\$

C has two inputs. Each input of C is connected to exactly one output of another device. Connecting two outputs together usually results in smoke, or the mathematical equivalent, when they compete.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ I agree with vicatcu. \$\endgroup\$
    – SteveSh
    Commented Dec 5, 2019 at 0:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ And there are no directed cycles -- meaning, there's no signal path that loops back on itself. \$\endgroup\$
    – TimWescott
    Commented Dec 5, 2019 at 1:24

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.