1
\$\begingroup\$

I was looking over the circuit design for OpenEVSE. I was specifically interested in the GFCI portion of the circuit: enter image description here

This circuit measures the current difference between Line and Neutral on a 120/240v 50-60Hz power source using a current transformer on the bottom two pins of the pin heade.

AFAIK this circuit triggers an interrupt on an MCU if the difference in current is larger than 20mA (50mA??).

I assume the 2 zeners are to avoid damaging the circuit from large current(voltage) spikes.

Both op amps are powered with +5v. It seems to me that this circuit will only trigger on the positive half of the AC wave. Since we are talking about 50-60Hz, this could mean there is a whole +/-25ms from the time where a short is created to when it is detected. Not to mention the time for the contactor to open...

I am wondering if I am overreacting and this is typical of GFCI circuitry. This circuit is usually hooked up to a 30+ amp breaker. Is my analysis correct? Is this an acceptable amount of delay to interrupt the power source in a ground fault condition?

My thought would be to have the op amps in an "absolute value" configuration and trigger on both halves of the ac waveform, saving up to 25ms.

\$\endgroup\$
9
  • \$\begingroup\$ But will it detect a DC fault to ground? That is, a fault after the rectifiers in a SMPS?... \$\endgroup\$
    – bobflux
    Commented Dec 16, 2019 at 22:25
  • \$\begingroup\$ The first amplifier stage is inverting and then rectifying so it will detect on the negative half-cycle, I think. \$\endgroup\$
    – Transistor
    Commented Dec 16, 2019 at 22:30
  • \$\begingroup\$ @peufeu No i don't think it will detect a fault in an SMPS but then the power supply itself should probably have it's own protection. I know in the case of this circuit that electric vehicles do have protection built-in on the DC charging side. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 16, 2019 at 22:35
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Transistor Yeah your right, same result tho. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 16, 2019 at 22:36
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @james Absolutely. I came up with my own implementation requiring the MCU and a latching "GFCI" circuit that I came up with (essentially a SR latch with a variable trigger voltage) to provide a logic LOW. If either goes HIGH, then the contactor is de-energized. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Dec 17, 2019 at 19:25

1 Answer 1

-1
\$\begingroup\$

How long is that 10uF capacitor going to take to charge? a lot of half-cycles, that's how long. It doesn't make sense to load the output of the first stage that way. So yeah, unsafe.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ The cap should charge instantaneously, there is no resistance between it and gnd. It should, on the other hand, discharge slowly as D3 prevents it from discharging through the op-amp's "pull" half of the output. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 6, 2020 at 17:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.