0
\$\begingroup\$

When performing a noise analysis in LTspice of a 1kΩ resistor, a noise level of 4nV/rtHz is simulated.

However, if this resistor value is set to 1kΩ using .param, its noise decreases to 129fV/rtHz. Changing this resistor value does change the noise linearly. What causes this noise decrease, and what can I do to prevent it?

The schematic is shown below:

Resistor noise simulation

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ At 20 degC, 1k gives 4nV/rtHz but 1 ohm gives 0.127 nV/rtHz. Maybe the "k" is upsetting things. Try 1000 in the .param thing. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Jan 3, 2020 at 14:29

2 Answers 2

1
\$\begingroup\$

You should use {Rg} as value for R1, so without the R=.

Using the plain value 1u or R={1k} also gives 129 fV/Hz½.

I've no idea what makes the evaluation of R={1k} or R={Rg} to become 1uΩ

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ In that case, how can I use arithmetic in the value field, such as: i.imgur.com/bvczWO8.png This raises the error: "Unknown parameter '-' ". \$\endgroup\$
    – Elmardus
    Jan 3, 2020 at 14:53
  • \$\begingroup\$ To answer my own question: mathematical operations should also be within the curly braces, not outside them. So, to set the resistor for my circuit the value should be set to: {350-Rg} \$\endgroup\$
    – Elmardus
    Jan 3, 2020 at 15:09
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ R= replaces the primitive resistor with a behavioural resistor, which no longer has a builtin noise source. And, as you perhaps know, if you don't need noise in an R/L/C, add noiseless next to the value. The small noise figure is just floating point residual. @Elmardus Elements should have values, and curly braces (or single quotes) perform evaluation such that the resulting value is passed to the parser and further. Behavioural elements (V=, I=, R=) don't need curly braces because the expression after the equal is automatically understood as an expression to be evaluated. \$\endgroup\$ Jan 4, 2020 at 20:12
0
\$\begingroup\$

In LTSPICE XVII(64) this seems to work... Noise output is about 0.9nV/rt(Hz) as expected: screenshot
Perhaps the 129fV/rt(Hz) is a result of an added Thevenin resistance added to the voltage source??

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.