I want measure Johnson Noise across a resistor having certain over the certain range of frequency or bandwidth practically. I am starting from scratch, how can I build circuitry and instrumentation so that I will get more precise output values. Like theoretically we can calculate (for example, \$V_n^2 = 4RkT\Delta f\$ ; \$V_n = 1.6\mathrm{mV}\$ for \$R=16\mathrm{k}\Omega\$, \$T=300K\$, \$\Delta f=10\mathrm{kHz}\$, \$k=\$ Boltzmann constant ) but practically I am facing some problems with circuitry.
\$\begingroup\$
\$\endgroup\$
8
-
2\$\begingroup\$ Experimental setup at web.mit.edu/dvp/Public/noise-paper.pdf \$\endgroup\$– Scott SeidmanCommented Jan 7, 2020 at 13:37
-
\$\begingroup\$ I think you are also having problems calculating the noise (Vn) too. \$\endgroup\$– Andy akaCommented Jan 7, 2020 at 14:16
-
\$\begingroup\$ @Scott Seidman I don't have much resources, I'm looking for simple experiment setup. \$\endgroup\$– learnerCommented Jan 7, 2020 at 15:07
-
\$\begingroup\$ @Andy aka Is there any mistake in the equation of voltage? \$\endgroup\$– learnerCommented Jan 7, 2020 at 15:08
-
\$\begingroup\$ sengpielaudio.com/calculator-noise.htm try this or this: daycounter.com/Calculators/Thermal-Noise-Calculator.phtml - they give 1.6 uV not 1.6 mV. \$\endgroup\$– Andy akaCommented Jan 7, 2020 at 15:17
|
Show 3 more comments
1 Answer
\$\begingroup\$
\$\endgroup\$
3
"but practically I am facing some problems with circuitry."
Oh yes, I'll bet you are. You've stated in comment that you "don't have much resources", and this will probably be an issue.
Measuring Johnson noise is quite straightforward: You put a high-gain op-amp across a resistor and measure the output. Then you short the input and look at the output again. The difference is due to the noise in the resistor. Of course, the devil (or God, depending on your source) is in the details.
First, you need a very low-noise op amp - one with a specified noise input well below the predicted resistor noise. These are actually pretty cheap these days, but you can't use just any op amp you have lying around. You most definitely can't use a 741, an LM2900, or pretty much any general purpose (really cheap) op-amp. You CANNOT use a wireless breadboard, even if you keep the leads much shorter than most breadboarders do. And you need to put the circuit inside a Faraday Cage: the ether is filled with all sorts of stray EM fields, particularly around 50 or 60 Hz. None of this is horribly expensive, especially if you can find a source of double-sided pc board scraps for your enclosure. You can find very cheap sources for small pc board prototypes for building your circuit, and there is free software which will allow you to produce the etching masks, but you'll need to do your homework.
For inspiration, I suggest you study the "What's All This ..." articles written by the late great Bob Pease.
answered Jan 9, 2020 at 21:19
-
\$\begingroup\$ Just a practical comment: regarding the measuring set-up, this note by Jim Williams may be of some help. For example it is wort to notice that the low-noise OpAmp should be powered by a battery arrangement, while the Faraday cage was made from a butter cookies metal box: not exactly the most expensive parts on the market. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 10, 2020 at 6:32
-
1\$\begingroup\$ @DanieleTampieri - I got the idea of using scrap unetched pc board pieces to build an enclosure from Jim Williams. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jan 15, 2020 at 13:51
-
\$\begingroup\$ Thank you for suggestions. I'll take this in consideration. \$\endgroup\$– learnerCommented Feb 1, 2020 at 20:52