I've been tasked with non-invasively measuring a 200 mA pulse signal through a wire. The solutions that come to mind are using a current clamp or a hall effect sensor. I don't need an accurate reading, I just need to sense when the pulse is there. Any suggestions?

  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ You already answered your own question. Current clamp/hall sensor. \$\endgroup\$
    – winny
    Feb 13, 2020 at 7:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ what bandwidth is needed for the measurement, what risetime do you want to resolve on the edges of the pulse? \$\endgroup\$
    – Neil_UK
    Feb 13, 2020 at 7:39
  • \$\begingroup\$ For DC, I'd go hall-effect. And since you don't need accuracy or precision, that recommendation goes double, I think. Bandwidth may be an issue. But you didn't mention it, so I'm guessing you'll be okay. \$\endgroup\$
    – jonk
    Feb 13, 2020 at 7:48
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you for the replies. Well, the only details given to me were that the pulse is around 100 ms long, and it's not periodic, since it comes from a "totalizer." My worry is that most current clamps I find are at least 5 A in rating, and if I can find a hall effect sensor that can measure such a very weak magnetic field. \$\endgroup\$ Feb 13, 2020 at 8:00
  • \$\begingroup\$ A current clamp is used for ad-hoc current measurements. If it is a permanent fixture you would use a current transformer. I found one which went down to 125mA (and there is a 500mA one too: digikey) \$\endgroup\$
    – Oldfart
    Feb 13, 2020 at 8:16

1 Answer 1


Other than hall effect sensor, if you have a current probe..

  1. set it to the best possible settings.. (just an example: 2A per 1V instead of 2 A per 100mV)..

  2. Roll the wire 10 times around the clamp in the same direction. Now, on the oscilloscope you will measure \$10 X\$ the actual current through the wire.

For the update:.

If you are planning for multiple, hall sensor is cheaper and practical.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you for the suggestion. :) Unfortunately, I want to interface several of these to an Arduino, and current probes are expensive. \$\endgroup\$ Feb 13, 2020 at 8:30
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ @RonnelTehrencePaclibar you've asked for suggestions then you start putting constraints on what you want. Put all constraints down in the question. I mean all of them like size, cost, bandwidth, type of conductor to sense, voltage on that conductor, accuracy, drift.... and add these constraints to your question. This isn't a forum it's a Q and A site and we expect questions to be(come) fully formed and unambiguous. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Feb 13, 2020 at 10:45

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.