0
\$\begingroup\$

Nothing comes to mind that really needs exactly 19V, with USB-C on board which can provide 20V it seems even a bit of a drawback to step up the voltage rather than increasing the PSU voltage.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ The 19 V has been in use for years as the supply voltage for laptops and small form factor PCs. The 20 V of USB-C is much newer. 19 V or 20 V isn't that much of a difference, a 19 V product that cannot cope with 20 V is a poor design. \$\endgroup\$ Feb 26 '20 at 16:59
0
\$\begingroup\$

Your assumption that if the supply was 20 V, it could be used directly for USB-C doesn't take into account the fact that the there is tolerance on the supply voltage.

That tolerance depends on what supply you're using. If you're using a 20 V supply that for some reason outputs 19.5 V then how could the USB-C output deliver 20 V? It would be unable to do so and would then be "out of spec."

To guarantee 20 V on the USB-C output, a guaranteed 20 V (or more) is needed, that means that it would typically need to be around 21 to 22 V to account for tolerances. That means 1 to 2 volt has to be "burned off" (using a linear regulator) which is inefficient.

A switched converter could be used as well but that generally makes little sense for small voltage differences. You'd really need a buck/boost converter to support a wide range of input voltages.

Since a buck/boost is needed anyway it can be more efficient to make 12 V from 19 V (easy using a buck converter and that would work over wide tolerances, if your 19 V supply was only 17 V that could still be enough) and then use a buck/boost converter to make 5 V, 9 V, 20 V for USB-C.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ So, 19V was chosen in order to have 7V of headroom to provide power to the 12V rails or does something actually draw more than 12V? I can also imagine going for a higher voltage to reduce amperage and heat generation on the connectors. 19V still seems a bit arbitrary though. Wouldn't 24V be more common? Haven't read enough datasheets to tell if 24V rather than 19V excludes maximum ratings for common buck converters. \$\endgroup\$
    – Horst
    Feb 27 '20 at 8:05
  • \$\begingroup\$ The 19 V is probably (I wasn't there when 19V was chosen) the result of amount of power, safety, price and many other factors. Wouldn't 24V be more common? Why? Because that's 2 x 12 V which is car battery voltage? Also an arbitrary choice. And supporting 24 V means the electronics need to be able to handle up to 28 V, that makes them more expensive. Maybe today 24 V buck converters are cheap, they might not have been long ago when 19 V was chosen. \$\endgroup\$ Feb 27 '20 at 8:18

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.