0
\$\begingroup\$

Initially assuming that the input current is sinusoidal.

In a practical transformer, flux \$\phi\$ produced in the primary is not linearly proportional to the current \$I\$ through it. Due to saturation, the flux flattens

enter image description here

It's said that this flattening implies the presence of a dominant 3rd harmonic in addition to the fundamental

enter image description here

Questions:

  1. Why does the presence of the third harmonic in the flux, alter the current (by adding a third harmonic out of phase by a 180\$^{\circ}\$)?

  2. Why is it out of phase?

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Are those homework questions that you have to answer? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 10, 2020 at 7:40
  • \$\begingroup\$ @MarkoBuršič no \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 10, 2020 at 11:07

1 Answer 1

2
\$\begingroup\$

Initially assuming that the input current is sinusoidal.

and

Why does the presence of the third harmonic in the flux, alter the current (by adding a third harmonic out of phase by a 180∘)?

That's the bottom line - no matter what the flux does (in terms of non-linearity), the current is sinusoidal by definition.

However, if the winding were driven by a sine wave voltage then that's a different story and, current can appear very oddly affected by the diminishing flux at higher peak levels: -

enter image description here

GIF from here.


Reason

In a normal inductor this formula applies \$V = L\dfrac{di}{dt}\$

This gives us the sine-cosine relationship between voltage and current but, only if inductance is unchanging. As the core saturates, inductance drops dramatically and this, in turn, leads to a much greater \$\frac{di}{dt}\$.

Then, knowing\$^1\$ that the definition of inductance per turn is \$\dfrac{\Phi}{I}\$, if \$L\$ decreases and \$I\$ increases, then flux remains unaffected.


\$^1\$ We are taught that \$V = L\dfrac{di}{dt}\$ and this is taken from Faraday's law: \$V = N\dfrac{d\Phi}{dt}\$.

So, if we equate them: \$\dfrac{L}{N} = \dfrac{d\Phi}{di}\$ or, inductance per turn equals flux per amp.

\$\endgroup\$
6
  • \$\begingroup\$ I don't get it... What exactly happens when I apply a sinusoidal voltage to the primary? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 10, 2020 at 11:09
  • \$\begingroup\$ If the voltage is low then you get a sinusoidal current. As the voltage rises the flux in the core saturates and you get a non-linear rise in current hence, the magnetization current looks very non-sinusoidal. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Commented Mar 10, 2020 at 11:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ what is the animation depicting, the flux seems to be sinusoidal \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 10, 2020 at 11:15
  • \$\begingroup\$ The flux is sinusoidal for an applied sinewave of voltage - this is because the current rises dramatically during extremes of saturation and forces the flux to be higher. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Commented Mar 10, 2020 at 11:26
  • \$\begingroup\$ If current induces flux, and voltage causes current, shouldn't the current be sinusoidal, with a flattened flux like the first image? Why does current "become" non sinusoidal (with a dominant 3rd harmonic) to make flux sinusoidal? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Mar 13, 2020 at 1:48

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.