0
\$\begingroup\$

I need to use node analysis on the following circuit.enter image description here

I am confused as to how to solve node 1 as there is a battery of 3V between the node and 4 ohm resistor. Should I solve for it?

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ There is also a battery before a 3 ohm resistor at the left-hand side. That does not confuse you? Just because a source is drawn horizontal does not make it special. \$\endgroup\$
    – Oldfart
    Mar 19, 2020 at 10:16
  • \$\begingroup\$ pick a place to call 0V and proceed from there \$\endgroup\$
    – vicatcu
    Mar 19, 2020 at 11:58

3 Answers 3

1
\$\begingroup\$

First, if you are going to use nodal analysis you must select and clearly indicate which node is the reference node.

Again assuming that you are required to use nodal analysis: If you have a voltage source in your circuit that is not connected to the reference node (either directly or through other voltage sources) then you must create a supernode that encloses both of the nodes of the voltage source itself.

You can write one equation for the currents in and out of the supernode, and another equation (by inspection) for the voltage between the two nodes of the supernode.

In your specific circuit, you need to name a new node at the right end of the 3V source. Create a supernode comprising that node and V1. Start writing equations, and off you go.

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

You will need to use the superposition theorem. That is replace the voltage sources with a short subsequently and then add the resulting values.

This explains it in detail:

https://www.allaboutcircuits.com/textbook/direct-current/chpt-10/superposition-theorem/

Also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superposition_theorem

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ No, there is no need to use superposition in this case. You may find it easier but it is not necessary. \$\endgroup\$ Mar 19, 2020 at 11:38
0
\$\begingroup\$

Well, we have the following circuit:

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

When we use and apply KCL, we can write the following set of equations:

$$ \begin{cases} \text{I}_2=\text{I}_1+\text{I}_3\\ \\ \text{I}_1=\text{I}_2+\text{I}_6\\ \\ \text{I}_5=\text{I}_4+\text{I}_3\\ \\ \text{I}_4=\text{I}_5+\text{I}_6 \end{cases}\tag1 $$

When we use and apply KVL, we can write the following set of equations:

$$ \begin{cases} \text{I}_1=\frac{10-\text{V}_1}{3}\\ \\ \text{I}_2=\frac{\text{V}_1}{8}\\ \\ \text{I}_2=\frac{\text{V}_3-\text{V}_2}{4}\\ \\ \text{I}_4=\frac{\text{V}_3}{12}\\ \\ \text{I}_5=\frac{6-\text{V}_3}{14}\\ \\ \text{V}_2-\text{V}_1=3 \end{cases}\tag2 $$

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Your 2nd set of equations don't come from KVL but from the constitutive relations of the elements. \$\endgroup\$
    – The Photon
    Mar 19, 2020 at 12:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.