I'm driving an ADL5802 RF mixer with a 5400BL15B050E RF balun. The balun turns a single ended signal into a differential signal on balanced lines for the mixer. In my attempt to match the balun datasheet land pattern, the balanced lines for a short distance are not right next to one another (though they do have the same length). However, I understand that differential signals should generally be placed immediately adjacent. Here's the current PCB layout, showing the mixer (left), blocking caps (middle) and baluns (right). The white squares can be ignored as they are just component courtyards

enter image description here

And here's the land pattern from the balun datasheet (same pin orientation as my pcb layout):

enter image description here

Am I better off ignoring the balanced line exit angles from the balun and keeping the lines next to one another, or respecting the exit angle and having some temporary separation between them? I could, of course, also move the miters closer together to minimize the separation a little.

Although its not shown since I haven't done the copper pour yet (or the via fence), these tx lines are grounded coplanar waveguides with width 0.34mm and gap 0.1524mm (I've used this for the differential spacing after the caps as well). The height to the next layer ground plane is 0.1702mm. The substrate is FR408 Oshpark 4-layer with a dielectric of about 3.64 at 6GHz, which is my max signal frequency. I've simulated the GCPW (grounded coplanar waveguide) with OpenEMS as well as the miters and blocking cap ground cutouts for a single ended line. I haven't actually simulated the effect of the second line on Z0, but I think it should be the same since each gcpw just sees a conductor 0.1524mm away.


I contacted the manufacturer who indicated tightly coupling the lines right out of the pads is fine (shown in the blue circle in the image below). So, that's what I'll use.

enter image description here

  • \$\begingroup\$ What's in the white squares? And what is GCPW - Grounded Coplanar Waveguide? \$\endgroup\$
    – SteveSh
    Mar 26, 2020 at 23:37
  • \$\begingroup\$ Component courtyards and yes, that's correct. I've also edited the question to clarify both points. \$\endgroup\$
    – MattHusz
    Mar 26, 2020 at 23:53

1 Answer 1


The manufacturer's recommended layout looks strange to me. I would have expected to see a differential pair coming out of the balanced ports.

Having said that, I think you're OK either way for the distances involved in your design. I would have used a tightly coupled differential pair right out of the balun, unlike what you currently have. It may give you some additional crosstalk/interference protection. Pay special attention to the presence of ground vias as close as possible to the ground pins (2, 5).

Also, when designing the transmission lines keep in mind you want Zdiff=50Ω. In the case of the weakly coupled lines out of the balun before the caps, this translates in Zo~25Ω for each line individually. In the case of a tightly coupled pair, like you currently have between the caps and the mixer, Zo may have to be somewhat higher than 25Ω, so that you achieve Zdiff=50Ω.

One more comment: the lines between the caps and the mixer don't seem to be properly length matched - the outer trace within each pair looks a little longer to me.

  • \$\begingroup\$ You correctly identified that the outer trace is longer than the inner. Any recommendations on ways to length match them? I guess I could add extra turns, or angle the capacitors and maybe balun. Any thoughts, or resources for this? \$\endgroup\$
    – MattHusz
    Mar 28, 2020 at 0:16
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ One option is to route with two 90-degree turns as opposed to route with a diagonal pair like you have now. Ideally you should use arcs as opposed to sharp corners. The other option is to add a small U-shaped detour on the inner trace close to the cap. \$\endgroup\$
    – joribama
    Mar 28, 2020 at 4:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ Hey, I realize a bit of time has passed since this answer, but I realized I failed to appreciate part of your answer. Why is it so critical that the ground vias be placed as close as possible to pins 2/5? \$\endgroup\$
    – MattHusz
    Apr 15, 2020 at 23:26

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.