Will a BJT blow up if there isn't any load/resistance either in collector or emitter?

When an NPN BJT is operating in the active mode, $$\I_C = \beta I_B\$$. That means we can fully control the current pass through the BJT by controlling $$\I_B\$$ only. In such case, as we didn't place any load/resistance along either collector or emitter, which means $$\V_{CE} = V_{CC}\$$. Therefore, as a result, the BJT would have $$\I_C = \beta I_B\$$ and $$\V_{CE} = V_{CC}\$$, this looks fine!

So, does it mean that a BJT won't blow up if there isn't any load/resistance either in collector or emitter?

• You are oversimplifying how a BJT works. $I_C = \beta I_B$ only under certain circumstances. This formula applies in the active mode if there is sufficient current available at the collector. It does not apply if the base-emitter junction is reverse biased. It does not apply if the transistor is in saturation. Apr 4, 2020 at 13:46
• @ElliotAlderson: I'd say this is appropriately simplifying for the case the OP is talking about: liming collector current with positive but limited base current, for constant Vce = Vcc. If you saturate the base current, it will pretty definitely fail. Apr 4, 2020 at 14:33
• @PeterCordes You and I know what the OP is actually asking about, but the neophyte who reads this question might not. I've seen many students get confused because they read some similar unqualified statement "on the internet" and didn't understand the background. Apr 4, 2020 at 16:34
• @ElliotAlderson: Ah, I wasn't thinking about misleading future readers. You could edit the question to qualify that statement, like maybe "(for small forward bias currents)". Apr 4, 2020 at 16:42
• @PeterCordes Good point...I've made the edit. I didn't want to make any of the existing answers look crazy but I think it will be OK. Apr 4, 2020 at 17:06

From the theoretical point of view, i.e if $$\T_J\equiv \text{const.}\$$, $$\T_A\equiv \text{const.}\$$ where $$\T_J\$$ and $$\T_A\$$ are respectively the junction and ambient temperature of the device and provided that the chosen $$\V_{CE}\$$ and $$\I_C\simeq I_E\$$ are not such that the maximum power rating $$\P_D\$$ is not exceeded, the answer is Yes, you do not need an emitter series resistor $$\R_E\$$ nor a collector series resistor $$\R_C\$$ in order to avoid the destruction of the BJT you are biasing.

However, the real story is quite different: first of all, the relation between $$\I_C\$$ and $$\I_B\$$ is in reality $$I_C=\beta(T_J)I_B\label{1}\tag{1}$$ where $$\\beta(T_J)\$$ increases as $$\T_J\$$ increases. In the real situation, when you apply a $$\I_B\simeq \text{const.}\$$ to the base of the device, its junction temperature start to rise from $$\T_J\simeq T_A\$$ thus the $$\I_C\$$ current starts to rise according to \eqref{1}. It may seem that the process would stop when $$\T_J\$$ reaches an equilibrium value: however, it is not so. This is due basically to two facts

1. The process has an intrinsic positive feedback: the rising of the temperature causes a rising of the collector current which, in turn, causes the rise of dissipation and thus of the junction temperature, and
2. the imperfections inside of the semiconductor (recombination and generation centers, cristalline defects), which play the role of triggering hot spots inside the device, cause a destructive thermal drift which soon or later (with probability $$\\simeq 1\$$ very soon) bring it to destruction.

The only way to avoid the thermal destruction of the device is to lower $$\I_B\$$ as the temperature $$\T_J\$$ rises, and this is customarily accomplished in two ways

• The classical method: add a $$\R_E\$$ resistor in series to the emitter. A rise in $$\I_C\$$ would imply a rise in the emitter current $$\I_E\$$ and a rise of the emitter voltage $$\V_E\$$: this implies a lowering of the $$\V_{BE}=V_B-V_E\$$ voltage and thus a decreasing of $$\I_B\$$ which contrasts the rising of the collector current.
• The analog integrated circuit method: feed the base with a temperature matched decreasing $$\V_{BE}\$$. If, instead of using a bias base current generator, you feed the base of your device with the voltage generated by a nearly constant current flowing across a physically close junction, you get a temperature drift compensation, as normally happens in current mirrors.

Two final notes

• In order to stabilize the quiescent point of a BJT, you must mandatorily provide a negative temperature feedback to its biasing network. The two methods described above are the standard ones, but there are other, more complex ways of doing the same thing.
• Adding a $$\R_C\$$ resistor in series to the collector avoid the destruction of the BJT. However ,this is accomplished because the resistor limits both the $$\I_C\$$ current and the $$\V_{CE}\$$ voltage, and thus the power $$\P_D\simeq V_{CE}\cdot I_C\$$ dissipated on the device: the resulting quiescent values obtained in this way for these parameters may not therefore be useful for any application, be it signal amplification or switching.
• There's some upper limit to how high β can go, so if you don't care about the operating point you can choose a low enough base current to make sure total power is limited, right? I posted a simple answer explaining this; can you have a look at confirm that I got it right? I think your point about needing some kind of negative feedback is only true if you want to build a useful circuit where you care about the operating point, not just avoiding exploding. Apr 4, 2020 at 13:06
• @PeterCordes, nice observations: you absolutely need some kind of temperature dependent feedback only if you care about the operating point (my final note on avoiding destruction by using an $R_C$ alludes to this). And you have also a good point in your observation on the thermal rise of $\beta$: however, even if the mean value across the device is limited to, say, 200°C, there can be (and surely there are) hot spots in the junction where $T_J$ could rise above this limit. Cont'd. Apr 4, 2020 at 14:16
• @PeterCordes (cont'd) You have to carefully choose the $I_B$ value in order to reach a thermal equilibrium point. This value surely exists since (at least for customary silicon BJTs) the $I_{CB0}$ leakage current is not sufficient to turn on the device, but its value is around few tens of nanoamperes, with is almost 1000 times lower respect to the base current you've chosen for your example. Therefore, as I stated in my previous comment, your point is good, but I am not sure that your example works correctly in practice ($50\mu\mathrm{A}$ is a large bias current for the base of a BJT) Apr 4, 2020 at 14:32

Normally you have some kind of load attached to the collector or emitter since the purpose of the transistor is to provide current or voltage gain depending upon the circuit configuration.

Having said that within the constraints (see datasheet https://www.farnell.com/datasheets/115091.pdf as an example) of the device what you have stated is true e.g. don't exceed max VCEO for mps2222a of 40V. But if you connect this device to any VCC and exceed the max power dissipation of 1.5W or alternatively continuous current of 600mA (which will correspond to βIb for the value of β at that base current) you will likely blow the device.

Most transistors have a graph of SOA (safe operating area) in the datasheet. If you stay within the constraints of the SOA you (in theory anyway) won't destroy the transistor.

The edges of what is permissible depend on thermal constraints for DC, on breakdown voltage and on second breakdown characteristics of the transistor.

So, according to the above graph, if you apply 50V Vce, a 1A collector current is permissible for no longer than 0.005 seconds.

That represents a base current of typically about 13mA but it could be quite a bit lower or higher (maybe 3:1 or 5:1).

You mean if you keep the base current low enough so the emitter current is also limited?

Sure, provided base current is low enough to keep $$\I_C \cdot V_{CC}\$$ dissipation within the device's rated power dissipation, with whatever heat sink you put on it. BJTs are current-controlled devices, they limit how much current flows through them even at a constant voltage. And thus power for a fixed voltage drop.

Daniele points out that $$\h_{FE}\$$ aka $$\\beta\$$ has a temperature coefficient, so if you wanted to actually try this, make sure to choose your bias current low enough that worst-case $$\\beta\$$ (at $$\T_{J\max}\$$ for example) will still only produce a small emitter current.

If you care about the actual operating point, you'd need some kind of bias feedback as described in Daniele's answer.

But if you just want to pull some current from Vcc to ground without exploding, not caring about the actual current or operating point, that's easy.

For example, hook up collector and emitter across a +5V supply, and connect the base to +5V via a 100 kOhm resistor. Ignoring the base-diode forward voltage drop, that's 5V / 100k = 0.05 mA base current. For a very optimistic $$\h_{FE}\$$ of 500, that's an emitter current of 25mA. With that 5V supply, that's about 0.125 W. Or less if the real $$\\beta\$$ is not that high.

Unless temperature can make $$\\beta\$$ rise higher than 500, there's no possible way for it to dissipate more power than that. I ignored the base current in the power calculation for this back-of-the-envelope calculation because it's basically fixed and tiny.