I am installing a water depth OEM sensor that is a solid state, continuous fluid level sensor. The sensor provides a resistive output that is inversely proportional to the level of the liquid: the lower the liquid level, the higher the output resistance; the higher the liquid level, the lower the output resistance. We are trying to monitor overland water flow depth during the winter (Ontario). We loomed into using a sonic sensor that does not require to be submerged under water but it does not work because of the small pipe diameters. Pressure transducers do not work since they cannot be frozen or the sensors that can be frozen will not give us a measurement if it is frozen in a little bit of ice. The overland water flow is being measured in-situ on a farm fields where can collect water samples when the over land flow occurs.

The sites we are installing this sensors as well as a couple of other sensors and a data logger that will all run off of a 12v deep cell battery. The data logger I am using can measure voltage + 5v.

My electronics is very rusty since I have not used it for a long time. And the times when I used it was base on a couple of courses along within self training.

Sensor information:

  • Solid state, continuous fluid level sensor
  • Variable resistance: 3000 – 300 ohms + 10%( 3000 at water depth of 1 inch, 300 at water depth of 24 inches)
  • Sensor has a reference resistor 3000 + 10% for temperature compensation
  • Resolution: < 0.01 inch

I have researched a number of websites and found a lot of information on wheatstone bridges that I can use to convert the resistance to voltage. But since this will be a one arm bridge the voltage output will not be linear. I also found a one arm wheatstone with an op-amp connected to linearize the output, but I do not know type of op-amp and resistances.

  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ Not a direct answer to your question, but another option is to measure the voltage with a constant current through your sensor. The voltage might be able to be read across the Constant current sourse if you know the total voltage. Just an idea. \$\endgroup\$ Nov 20, 2012 at 1:29

3 Answers 3


Wheatstone bridges are mostly used for very small resistance changes in a sensor, like for a strain gage or something like that. Your resistance change is huge, so you don't need one. As most have been saying, put a constant current source into your sensor. In the attached schematic, as the noninverting input of the op amp is at virtual ground, the current going through the sensor will be a constant 1ma. You haven't offered enough of a response profile to allow us to help you to linearize (or if you even need to), but log and inverse log amps can be found here. I have a feeling an inverse log amp will help. Alternatively, you can sample the output (after inverting it once to make it positive), and use a lookup table if that gives you enough sensitivity in your range of interest


simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab


You have only provided the endpoints and not the intermediate points to linearize the data. I appears to be a magnetostiction floating fluid sensor, but no P/N or spec given. Given it has a 24" range and 0.01" resolution it implies a dynamic range of 1/2400 which requires significant effort to ensure low noise and linear correction.


Get the linear output sensor instead in 4~20mA current loop or linear voltage output for easier interfacing.

What accuracy over the range do you need?


A "standard" way to do this is using a constant current source as previously described. It will convert resistance directly into volts.

You may want to make a four-wire connection to it so that any volt-drop down the current feed and return wires are not seen by the sense wires. The two sense wires (directly connected to the sensor) can be fed into an instrumentation amp such as the AD8221. The AD8221 will need a little negative supply but will work a treat. I've used hundreds in similar jobs on multichannel instrumentation jobs connected to strain gauges (1/4, half and full) and a few on pressure sensors etc..

Without looking further, I expect there'll be an instro amp that will handle inputs down to 0V overcoming the need for a small negative supply. Let me know if you need more circuit detail. I expect the bandwidth you are looking for is less than 10Hz so applying op-amp low-pass filters after the instro amp will reduce noise considerably.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.