I have read wikipedia and other websites regarding the purpose of a diode connected BJT.

But I am not clear on where should we use a diode connected BJT.

My questions :

  1. Where is a diode connected BJT used? Like, in what type of requirements do we need to use a diode connected BJT?

Please explain in simple terms.

Referred this link

  • \$\begingroup\$ In which article did you read about "the purpose of a diode connected BJT" ? Add a link to it. \$\endgroup\$ May 4, 2020 at 14:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Newbie Please read the last paragraph of the Wikipedia article Diode-connected transistor. \$\endgroup\$ May 4, 2020 at 14:19
  • \$\begingroup\$ @AndrewMorton , yes I read that but I wasn't able to get clarity \$\endgroup\$
    – Newbie
    May 4, 2020 at 14:23
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Bimpelrekkie , Added the link which I have referred \$\endgroup\$
    – Newbie
    May 4, 2020 at 14:24
  • \$\begingroup\$ Loosely speaking a diode connected BJT follows the shockley diode equation better than a diode. \$\endgroup\$
    – sstobbe
    May 4, 2020 at 14:35

5 Answers 5


"Reinforced diode". Diode connected BJT aka "active diode" is simply a transistor which collector is connected to the base. Thus the collector-emitter part of the transistor is connected in parallel to its base-emitter junction so we can think of this combination as of a "reinforced diode". The current through this "composed diode" is beta times bigger than the current through the single p-n (base-emitter) junction. So its IV curve is more vertical or, as they say, its differential resistance in this part is lower. That is why the active diode is better than the ordinary diode.

Note that the true diode (base-emitter junction) diverts only a beta part of the whole input (collector) current; so it acts as a low power (signal) diode that determines the behavior of the power "diode". Most of the current passes through the collector-emitter junction that initially had the behavior of a current stabilizer but now acts as a voltage stabilizer.

"Reversed" transistor. This connection introduces a voltage-type negative feedback that reverses the transistor behavior. Usually, the input voltage Vbe controls the output collector current Ic of the transistor while here, thanks to the negative feedback, it seems as if the "input" collector current controls the "output" voltage Vbe. This "reversed" transistor is used in the input part of the simple BJT current mirror (QREF in the Bimpelrekkie's picture).

This "reversal trick" can be observed in any negative feedback system since it adjusts its input so that to obtain the desired output. As a result, the output becomes an input and the input becomes an output. Another typical example is the ubiquitous op-amp non-inverting amplifier where the op-amp adjusts the input voltage VOA of the R1-R2 voltage divider so that to make its output voltage VR1 = VOA.R1/(R1 + R2) equal to the true input voltage VIN. As a result, the attenuator acts (with the help of the op-amp) as an amplifier with a gain of (R1 + R2)/R1.

"Rubber diode". If we apply not the whole collector-emitter voltage to the base-emitter junction but a part of it, VBE will be multiplied (like in the non-inverting amplifier). The "transistor diode" will act as a "transistor Zener diode" with any desired voltage. This network is widely used as a bias circuit in op-amp and power amplifiers.

Could you please throw some more light on "voltage-type negative feedback"?

The transistor and the collector resistor form the classic common-emitter amplifying stage. This is a voltage amplifier where we apply the input voltage to its input port - the base-emitter junction, and take the output voltage from its output port - the collector-emitter junction. Since the ground is common, when we connect the collector to base, actually we connect the output port to the input port in parallel... simply, the output to the input... As a result, all the output (collector) voltage is applied to the input; hence the name "voltage-type". Applied in such a "parallel" (shunt) way, the output voltage make the transistor decrease the same output voltage until the equilibrium is reached (roughly, VC = VB = 0.65 V). The name of this mechanism is "negative feedback"... and here it is a "voltage-type negative feedback".

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Thank you for the answer. Could you please throw some more light on "voltage-type negative feedback" \$\endgroup\$
    – Newbie
    May 4, 2020 at 15:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ Could you please provide an example with numericals when you say,"Note that the true diode (base-emitter junction) diverts only a beta part of the whole input (collector) current; so it acts as a low power (signal) diode that determines the behavior of the power "diode". Most of the current passes through the collector-emitter junction that initially had the behavior of a current stabilizer but now acts as a voltage stabilizer." Want to understand how much current when you said "beta" . How much would flow through the base emitter & how much through collector emitter? \$\endgroup\$
    – Newbie
    Oct 19, 2020 at 3:15
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Newbie, Calculations are not my passion and the circuit is difficult - non-linear and with feedback. If we suppose Ic = beta x Ib, we have to find one of the currents and Vbe. One way would be to write the circuit equation Vcc - Ic.R = Vbe(Vce) and use the Shockley expression also. Or try a graphical solving with iterations... \$\endgroup\$ Oct 20, 2020 at 5:26

A diode connected BJT has much better ideality factor than a regular diode and is used where close to ideal behaviour is required, such as in silicon temperature sensors.

Many of these sensors operate by pulsing two different levels of current through a diode, but to be accurate the ideality factor must be close to 1 (i.e. it is as close as possible to the Shockley ideal diode equation), which is true in a number of transistors but not in an ordinary diode.

Here is the application for the MAX31730 remote temperature sensor:

MAX31730 headline application

A very popular transistor for this type of application is the 2N3906 (PNP)

  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ What is the reason for that? The BJT, which was never designed to be a diode, acting as a more ideal diode than the diode which was actually designed specifically to be a diode? \$\endgroup\$
    – DKNguyen
    May 4, 2020 at 17:23
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @DKNguyen - that's right. Diodes can be pretty bad at being diodes. \$\endgroup\$ May 4, 2020 at 17:34
  • \$\begingroup\$ @KevinWhite, so, err, why don't we use BJTs as diodes always then? :) Just cost, or are there other issues? \$\endgroup\$
    – ilkkachu
    May 5, 2020 at 9:44
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ My comment only applies when under forward bias, they have other disadvantages - reverse breakdown voltage, for example, is very low - about 6V usually. \$\endgroup\$ May 5, 2020 at 14:32

Usually in very low leakage applications, e.g. high impedance input clamps to power rails, or log amplifiers, where leakage would disrupt the current to voltage relationship your hoping to make use of

Downsides are usually higher capacitance and much lower reverse voltage breakdown, but if you have small signals they can beat some of the better diodes you can buy with a solid margin,

You can also make use of the 2 different junctions in different ways, you have both the B-E junction and the B-C junction, both have different properties depending on what your hoping to accomplish.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you for an answer. But please help for me to understand in simple terms. I am not understanding it \$\endgroup\$
    – Newbie
    May 4, 2020 at 14:25
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ I am not understanding it Then you should not be asking the question that you have asked. The differences are small as we explain and relate to details that can only be understood if you have some level of understanding. \$\endgroup\$ May 4, 2020 at 14:31
  • \$\begingroup\$ Art of Electronics mentions the much lower reverse leakage current, if I’m remembering correctly. \$\endgroup\$
    – DavidG25
    May 4, 2020 at 15:34
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Bimpelrekkie -- So does it ever make sense to put a diode-connected-BJT in series with a diode for improved reverse leakage current and a higher reverse voltage? \$\endgroup\$ Feb 12 at 23:23

The only reasons I can think of when to use a diode connected BJT (Collector shorted to base) instead of a diodes are:

  • You need a diode now but only have BJTs

  • You're designing a circuit that will be on an IC. You need a diode but there are no suitable diodes available and/or they are not isolated from the silicon substrate and/or it is recommended to use a diode connected BJT instead of a diode.

As far as I know there are no specific advantages in using a diode connected BJT instead of a diode so using one or the other should not make a difference.

This Wikipedia article mentions that a diode connected BJTs are used in current mirrors:

enter image description here

the reason for doing this is that the transistors need to be well matched (be the same). If one is a diode and the other is a transistor then there's no guarantee that they will behave in the same way. When the "diode" is made from an identical transistor then they can be made the same and the currents will match (be the same).


I have used a diode-connected germanium BJT as a detector for a shunt-fed crystal radio with a forward voltage as low as 0.1V.

enter image description here

Tests on germanium BJT's in my collection showed a lower forward voltage with the base and emitter interconnected.


Here's another low-forward-drop application of a diode-connected-transistor Q453.


  • \$\begingroup\$ Very intriguing... I remember in the 60's I made such a detector with a shaving blade and pencil graphite:) Only note that your "transistor diode" is simply a diode (base-collector junction). There is now negative feedback here since the base is connected to the emitter... and the transistor input (base-emitter junction) is shorted. I can't explain its lower VF voltage... \$\endgroup\$ May 4, 2020 at 19:38
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Circuit fantasist, either way (base-emitter or base-collector) is okay for the crystal radio except for the small difference in the forward voltage. Even I built a foxhole radio in the 1960's! \$\endgroup\$
    – vu2nan
    May 5, 2020 at 4:39

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.