4
\$\begingroup\$

I recently started developing a digital regulator for a DCM boost (Digital regulator for DCM Boost - How does it relate to duty cycle?) And I've implemented the difference the following controller in C:

$$ G_{Z} = \frac{1.39 z^{-1} - 1.332z^{-2} }{2 - 2.002{z^{-1}} + 0.002031z^{-2}} $$

in terms of a difference equation:

$$ y[n] = 1.001\cdot y[n-1] - 0.0010155 \cdot y[n-2] + 0.695\cdot x[n-1] - 0.666 \cdot x[n-2] $$

My code is as follows:

// Digi Reg Coeffs
const float a1 = 1.001;
const float a2 = -0.0010155;

const float b0 = 0.0;   
const float b1 = 0.6975;   
const float b2 = -0.666;

typedef struct 
{

    float y0;   // new reg value
    float y1;   // last reg value
    float y2;   // last^2 reg value

    float x0;   // latest sample
    float x1;   // last sample
    float x2;   // last^2 sample

} voltage_control;

uint16_t DigitalRegulator(float error) {

    float duty = 0;

    voltage_control.x2 = voltage_control.x1;
    voltage_control.x1 = voltage_control.x0;     
    voltage_control.x0 = error;   /// this is the new sample

    voltage_control.y2 = voltage_control.y1;
    voltage_control.y1 = voltage_control.y0;

    //calc new y0
    voltage_control.y0 = (a1 * voltage_control.y1) + (a2 * voltage_control.y2) + (b0 * voltage_control.x0) + (b1 * voltage_control.x1) + (b2 * voltage_control.x2);


    // new value for PWM
    duty = (voltage_control.y0 / PWM_GAIN) * PERIOD_VALUE;

    return duty;

}

Is this the correct way to implement a difference equation? I'm asking because the resulting controller seems unstable, and I'd like to know if it's my implementation or something else.

\$\endgroup\$
11
  • \$\begingroup\$ Have you tried doing a linear model (in a sim) to make sure it doesn't go unstable - boost converters can be awfully tricky to get the control algorithm correct. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    May 7, 2020 at 17:19
  • \$\begingroup\$ I'm not sure what you mean by a linear model, do you mean in a circuit simulator like LTspice? If so, not yet, but its a great idea, I can implement the Laplace and see if it's stable \$\endgroup\$ May 7, 2020 at 17:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yes, that’s what I mean. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    May 7, 2020 at 18:16
  • \$\begingroup\$ Your coeffs in the G_C formula vary by 5-6 orders of magnitude, but your multipliers in your difference equation do not. ALSO, not sure how you can write a difference equation based on a formula using s instead of z, where 1/_z_ represents a 1-unit delay. BUT ignoring both of those, 1.905-0.9048 is greater than 1, so according to your diff equation, with ZERO input, your y's WILL go to infinity (each new y is "approximately" 1.0002 times the average-ish of the previous two, which grows without bound). \$\endgroup\$
    – Atomique
    May 7, 2020 at 19:31
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ your transfer function for \$G_Z\$ does not match your difference equation for \$y[n]\$. you have to multiply both numerator and denominator by \$\frac12\$ and then the coefficients should match except for a sign change regarding the denominator coefficients. \$\endgroup\$ May 8, 2020 at 2:33

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.