How would an antenna array of 100 elements be able to form 5000+ simultaneous beams?

Or do I have it wrong, there would only be a maximum 100 beams from the 100 elements at any one time and those 5000 potential beams are realized by hopping the 100 elements over the area so each of the potential 5000 beam gets a fraction of time from 1 element?


1 Answer 1


If you control an array of 100 antennas and are able to control the phase (and ideally, amplitude) of the signal of each of them, you can produce beams in arbitrary directions. That really means that you can point in any direction.

Looking at this as receive beamformer. Let \$w_{\phi,i}, \, i = 1, \ldots 100\in\mathbb C\$ be the individual antenna weight to point the beam in direction \$\phi\$. \$x_i(t)\$ is the antenna $i$ receive signal. Then, the beamformed receive signal \$y_\phi(t)\$ is

$$y_\phi(t) = \sum\limits_{i=1}^{100} w_{\phi,i}\cdot x_i(t) = \mathbf w_\phi^T \mathbf x(t)\text, $$

if written as elegant vector product.

Now, obviously, you can do that for other angles, such as for angle \$\psi\$,

$$y_\psi(t) = \sum\limits_{i=1}^{100} w_{\psi,i}\cdot x_i(t) = \mathbf w_\psi^T \mathbf x(t)\text. $$

Putting these beamformed receive signals in a receive signal vector instantly yields the elegance of the beamforming matrix \$\mathbf W\$:

$$\begin{pmatrix}y_\phi(t) \\ y_\psi(t) \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}\mathbf w_\phi^T\mathbf x(t) \\ \mathbf w_\psi^T\mathbf x(t)\end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix}\mathbf w_\phi^T \\ \mathbf w_\psi^T \end{pmatrix} \mathbf x(t)= \mathbf W \mathbf x(t)$$

There's no restriction on the number of rows in \$\mathbf W\$, so you can have arbitrarily many received beams as you want.

In transmit beamforming, the same applies. The only constraint there is that the sum of all the beamformed signal vectors needs to still be small enough to allow your transmitter to transmit them.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ The key, as Marcus said, is being able to apply the complex weights to each of the elements for each of the beam positions, and shapes, that you want. How many beams you can simultaneously achieve depends a lot on the frequencies involved, and how much hardware you want to throw at the problem. \$\endgroup\$
    – SteveSh
    Commented May 31, 2020 at 21:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.