23
\$\begingroup\$

We are teaching op amps in a high school class, before calculus. So we can't use control theory to teach how op amps respond. All the same, I would like to have an intuitive explanation for how a feedback circuit works. Take the negative feedback, for instance. Is there a clear way to show how an initial difference of delta between V+ and V- leads to a very large (G(V+ - V-)) difference in the output, which then leads to ... I'd like to be able to take that argument and show how the voltage of the output converges in addition to the standard virtual short argument.

Can anyone explain it clearly?

\$\endgroup\$
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ Perhaps something with levers? Or literal balancing: something on a high wire with a long arm below holding a counterweight. Small deviation produces a big swing in the weight, which pulls the system back into balance. Of course, your balancing system will have a frequency response ... \$\endgroup\$ – pjc50 Dec 3 '12 at 12:43
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ I agree, although this page only uses the inverting input and the + is grounded, the fulcrum must present an equally low impedance input as the + input to provide a stable balance. Of course you can shift the ground and the output would rise and fall with unity gain as the earth moves. allaboutcircuits.com/vol_3/chpt_8/6.html And matching ratios are like impedance ratios which may be resistive or capacitive like a paddle in water. \$\endgroup\$ – Tony Stewart Sunnyskyguy EE75 Dec 3 '12 at 13:10
  • \$\begingroup\$ Ther infinite gain is hard to picture, but imagine it as gravity and balancing a ball baearing on the fulcrum unless the offset is zero the gain is infinite and any offset will amplify the output which is the direction it falls. When a teeter totter is used with ratio feedback the differential the output voltage is the force of one side determined by the ratio of lengths. Assume the teeter-totter is weightless. \$\endgroup\$ – Tony Stewart Sunnyskyguy EE75 Dec 3 '12 at 13:20
  • \$\begingroup\$ Do you have access to simulation tools? I have a couple of ideas if you do. \$\endgroup\$ – Matt Young Dec 3 '12 at 14:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ what kind? I have octave, and could get ExtendSim \$\endgroup\$ – Dov Dec 22 '12 at 5:48
33
\$\begingroup\$

The basic feedback equation doesn't require any calculus or advanced math, only simple algebra. It should be well within high school level math. I find equations work a lot better if you first describe what is going on in words, then follow that up by writing the equation. You can even invite students to come up with the equation by modeling the verbal description. I usually explain feedback something like this:

A opamp is a very simple electronic building block that takes the difference between two voltages times a large gain:

$$Out = G(Vp - Vm)$$

Yup, it really is that simple. G is a very large number, usually at least 100,000 but can be more. That's too high to be useful by itself, and it can vary a lot from part to part. If we want to make something like a microphone preamp, for example, we only want a gain of around 1000. So opamps give us really high and unpredictable gain, but what we usually want is much lower and predictable gain. Does this mean opamps are of little use? Not at all, because there is a technique to harness the wild and wooly raw gain of the opamp to make a circuit with well behaved and predictable gain. That technique is called negative feedback.

Negative feedback means a portion of the output is subtracted from the input. This is a little hard to wrap your mind around at first, so let's consider this circuit:

Notice how R1 and R2 form a voltage divider like we talked about last week. In this example, the output of the voltage divider makes 1/10 of Out. Since that is going into the negative input of the opamp, it is being subtracted from the input (Vp) before being multiplied by the gain. To put this in mathematical terms:

$$Vm = \frac{Out}{10}$$

This isn't useful by itself because what we really want to know is what Out is as a function of the input, which we are calling Vp. Who has any ideas how to proceed? (Hopefully one of the students describes this or comes to the board to show the class this step).

To figure out what this circuit is really doing, which means to know what Out is as a function of Vp, we simply plug in the equation for Vm into the opamp equation above:

$$Out = G \Big(Vp - \frac{Out}{10} \Big)$$

after some rearranging

$$Out = \frac{10}{1 + \dfrac{10}{G}} Vp$$

That looks messy, but think about what this really means when G is large, which was our problem in the first place. The 10/G term is really small, so that added to 1 is still mostly 1. The overall gain from Vp to the output is then just 10 over nearly 1, so basically 10. We can also see this by looking at the circuit. Let's say we drive Vp with 1 volt. What would happen if the output were, say, 5 volts? Vm would have half a volt. So what will the opamp do? It takes the 1 volt of Vp, subtracts the half volt of Vm from it, and multiplies that resulting half volt by a large number. If G is 100,000, then the opamp wants to make the output 50,000 volts. It can't do that, so it will make the output as large as it can. Then what happens to Vm? It will go up. Eventually it will reach the 1 volt level of Vp. At that point the opamp stops trying to make a large output voltage. If the output goes too high, Vm will be higher than Vp, the opamp will multiply that difference (now negative) by its large gain and now slam the output low.

So we can see that if the opamp makes the output so that Vm is higher than Vp, it will quickly drive the output lower. If it is too low and Vm is less than Vp, it will drive the output higher. This immediate up and down tweaking will cause it to make the output whatever it has to be so that Vm pretty much follows Vp. I say "pretty much" because there still needs to be just a tiny difference between Vp and Vm to actually drive the opamp output to the right Out, but as you can see this difference will be very small because G is so large. That little difference is what the 10/G in the overall circuit equation was trying to tell us.

Let's do some examples. If G is 100,000, what is the overall gain of the circuit from Vp to Out? That's right, 9.9990. Now what if G is 500,000? 9.9998. We just changed G by a factor of 5, but the circuit gain changed by .008%. So does G matter at all? Not really, as long as it's big enough. Remember, this was one of the problems with opamps. The gain is large, but can vary a lot. One part could have a gain of 100,000 and the next 500,000. In this circuit it doesn't matter. We get a nice and stable gain of basically 10 no matter what opamp we happen to pick out of the bin. Remember that this was exactly what we set out to do.

But wait. Before we call it a day and congratulate ourselves for having solved all the world's problems, remember where that 10 came from. That was from the voltage divider value. Our overall circuit gain is controlled by that voltage divider. In fact, it is 1 over the fraction of the output fed back into the input. Let's call that fraction F, the feedback fraction, which is 1/10 in this example. Going back to the last equation, the overall circuit gain will be basically 1/F as long as that is small compared to G. So what if we needed a overall gain of 2? What could we change to get that? Yes, we could make R1 100Ω, or R2 900Ω. In fact as long as R1 and R2 are equal, the voltage divider will divide by 2, F will be 1/2, and the overall circuit gain therefore 2. (This is probably not the time to get into limits of R1 and R2 due to opamp drive capability and the like. Let them bask in their accomplishment today and get into limitations tomorrow).

There is obviously a lot more than can be said and followed on from here, but this basic introduction to negative feedback and the math behind it was all within a reasonable high school level. Of course it's a lot better in a real live walk thru that interactively involves the students than this one-way writeup on a web page, but hopefully you get the idea.

\$\endgroup\$
  • \$\begingroup\$ The best part: this works equally well in AC - it only requires a basic understanding of complex numbers (elementary school algebra in disguise), no need for calculus! \$\endgroup\$ – Reinstate Monica Feb 12 '15 at 17:58
7
\$\begingroup\$

I would like to have an intuitive explanation for how a feedback circuit works.

One approach that may help the students visualize feedback is to imagine replacing the op amp (in, for example, an inverting configuration) with a voltmeter, a student helper, and a variable voltage supply.

The voltmeter leads are the input terminals of the "op amp"; red lead is non-inverting (and grounded in this case), black lead is inverting (and connected to the junction of the two resistors).

The positive terminal of the variable voltage supply is the output of the "op amp" while the negative terminal is ground.

The student is to monitor the voltmeter and adjust the variable voltage supply so that the voltmeter reads zero volts at all times.

It should be clear enough to the students that, if the input voltage is positive, they would adjust the variable voltage supply negative in order to keep the voltmeter reading zero.

And, it should be clear enough that, if the feedback resistor is twice the input resistor, they would have to adjust the variable supply to be twice the (negative of) the input voltage.

Thus, the output will be, assuming the student is precise and quick enough, -2 times the input voltage.

\$\endgroup\$
4
\$\begingroup\$

Explaining basic opamp feedback does not require calculus, only simple algebra. Calculus really only comes into it when you try to analyze the dynamic behavior of a feedback-based system that includes reactive components (capacitors and coils).

Explaining how high gain + negative feedback leads to the concept of the "virtual short" is straightforward.

If you define the opamp as

\$V_{out} = G \cdot (V+ - V-)\$

and the feedback as

\$V- = K \cdot V_{out}\$

Then simple substitution gives

\$V+ - V- = \dfrac{V_{out}}{G} = \dfrac{V-}{G \cdot K}\$

Solve for \$V_-\$:

\$V- = \dfrac{V+}{1 + \dfrac{1}{G \cdot K}}\$

Now you point out that if G is a very large number (regardless of the value of K, which is usually a number less than 1), then the term \$\dfrac{1}{G \cdot K}\$ must be a very small number, which then means that the difference between V- and V+ is essentially zero — a short.

The effect gets stronger for larger values of G (a more ideal opamp) and it gets weaker for smaller values of K (weaker feedback).

\$\endgroup\$
0
\$\begingroup\$

A simple way to understand the feedback theory is to think of a water pump. Now, if you come in and open the tap to the pump, a lot of water will flow out of it. If you open more tap, more water flows out and so on. This is open loop op amp.

Now, if there is feedback applied, what that means is that if more water flows out of pump, it will automatically turn the tap "down" to reduce the water flow. Eventually, depending on how much the tap is turned "down", we can get a small trickle of water coming out. This is closed loop op amp.

The ability to turn "down" the tap if water flow increases is called feedback and we can control by the resistors in op amp. Because we are feeding back the output into input (water level to the tap), we call it feedback.

Now why do we need negative feedback for stability? Because when water level increases,if tap also increases, then we will get a "huge" flow and the system is unstable (positive feedback). However, negative feedback would reduce the tap if water level increases thus giving us an optimum output.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.