0
\$\begingroup\$

I'm new to PSpice and here I was trying to simulate a square wave oscillator using a LM193 on PSpice. Here is the circuit that I've created there:

enter image description here

Edit: The capacitor C1 has an IC set to 0

However, when I plot the waveform of Vout, this is the obtained result:

enter image description here

Even though this form "resembles" a square wave, it's not even close to what I wanted. I'd be really thankful if someone could explain a couple of things to me:

  1. Why is the signal oscillating only between 0 and -5V? Shouldn't it be between -Vsat and + Vsat, where Vsat is used to designate the saturation voltage of the Op Amp? What have I done wrong in this circuit?

  2. Moreover, isn't the output voltage supposed to be more symmetrical (therefore resembling more a square wave)? If someone could give me some advice on how to make it more like it I'd appreciate it.

Thanks a lot for your attention!

\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

The LM193 has an open collector output therefore, it needs a pull up resistor: -

enter image description here

Examples of a relaxation oscillator using a generic op-amp with push-pull output on the left and a single-supply connected LM193 (that requires a pull-up) on the right: -

enter image description here

Without a pull up resistor, the 100 ohm positive feedback resistor and 1 kohm resistor power the open collector output but not from the positive supply but from 0 volts. Hence that is why you see such an asymmetrical output voltage. Use a 1 kohm pull up resistor to V+ and increase R1 from 100 ohms to something like 10 kohm. 100 ohm is much too low for decent operation.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks a lot! Managed to solve it! By the way, could you enlighten on the role of the negative feedback resistor R on the waveform and also what would be a reasonable range of values for it? Thank you! \$\endgroup\$ – Rafael D'Ávila Jun 22 '20 at 13:37
  • \$\begingroup\$ I believe you mean the 50 kohm in your question yes? A range of a few hundred ohms to many tens of kohm is usually fine without any small_print. It controls how fast or how slow the capacitor is charged in the opposite direction. \$\endgroup\$ – Andy aka Jun 22 '20 at 13:48
1
\$\begingroup\$

A few problems here.

LM193, LM293, and LM393 are open collector 0V to Rout to V+ outputs. Your design is missing the pullup R.

Then you want to minimize the swing to Vin+,- so R1 should be much larger than R2. e.g. 10x

Also feedback R's should never be 100 Ohms. This is too low and will be current limited.

See page 3 https://www.st.com/resource/en/datasheet/lm193.pdf

Now try again using R2=100K split into 2 R's to Vcc and 0V. Then make R1= same or bigger than R2.

NOW you can use a single supply.

What happens when you reduce the feedback R on Vin-?

How is that different from increasing R1 for lower hysteresis?

See here

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.