1
\$\begingroup\$

I have a circuit that looks like the following. It appears to be simple-

enter image description here

What's the thevenin equivalent? I can't seem to simplify it as there are no common nodes that any of the resistors connect.

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ I would redraw this circuit first to clearly see what is parallel to what \$\endgroup\$
    – Eugene Sh.
    Jun 30 '20 at 17:35
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ R5 to R1 is as R4 to R2 - redraw to make the image simpler - this always helps. \$\endgroup\$
    – Andy aka
    Jun 30 '20 at 17:44
  • \$\begingroup\$ If you redraw your schematic you will find that it is similar to a "Wheatstone bridge" (not invented by Wheatstone who only popularized another's invention) except that there is a resistor where a source usually is placed. It's a classic case suggesting that you memorize the \$\Delta-Y\$ conversions (both directions may be worth memorizing.) But it can also be solved out using nodal analysis, too. Are you familiar with nodal? \$\endgroup\$
    – jonk
    Jun 30 '20 at 19:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ As others say, you can re-draw this to make it more clear. Also, this problem is often given with further condtions, like R1=R2=R4=R5. If you were given that information, you can simplify the circuit even further with a clever trick. \$\endgroup\$
    – The Photon
    Jun 30 '20 at 20:52
2
\$\begingroup\$

Use the delta-wye transformation and then you’ll see parallel and series combinations of resistors you can reduce.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Works like a charm- thanks! \$\endgroup\$ Jul 2 '20 at 17:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.