0
\$\begingroup\$

This question is specifically about node voltage method. In this example I subtracted the nodes (Vth - V1) / R2 in order to express the current over R2.

It seems to have worked out as my calculations matched the multisim simulation.

But this leaves me questioning:

Why not V1 - Vth instead? How does one to about choosing their polarities when expressing currents in terms of node voltages?

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ The arrow marked for the current through R2 is left to right. The corresponding current equation is \$(V1 - Vth)/R2\$; right ? Also, the +&- for Vth is not marked. What was the rationale for choosing \$(Vth - V1) / R2\$ in the first place ? \$\endgroup\$
    – AJN
    Commented Jul 5, 2020 at 5:21
  • \$\begingroup\$ There was no rationale. Simply an error. I must have been lucky because the answer turned out correct. \$\endgroup\$
    – BobaJFET
    Commented Jul 6, 2020 at 21:38

1 Answer 1

0
\$\begingroup\$

You can pick either polarity.

You can pick different polarities at different nodes.

You, however, must sum to ZERO the currents either

  • flowing INTO the node

or

  • flowing OUT_OF the node.

Thus I'd write that ---- summing currents INTO the node --- as

0 = I2 + (V1 - Vth)/R2 - (K * I) + I

but I'd redefine I as [ - Vth/1]

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.