1
\$\begingroup\$

I will try to explain where my question is coming from.

Knowing that voltage is the electric potential energy per unit of charge at a given point. And knowing that electrons are pushed from - to go to +

To me that means that the electrons won't have potential energy when arrived at + And they have the most when starting from - They should have more potential energy where they are leaving from and less where they are arriving.

That would mean that electrons have more potential energy at - than at + So in an AA battery (1.5V) I would expect that the voltage at the anode (-) is 1.5V and the voltage at the cathode (+) is 0V

But I am learning the opposite from my course and I do not understand why it is so. enter image description here

Improve this question
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

Conventional current is "upside down" with regard to electrons, due to some arbitrary choices of labelling made centuries ago. That's why I normally suggest ignoring them and focusing on conventional current and voltage analysis.

Electrons are negatively charged. Each electron has a charge of minus 1.602176634×10−19 coulombs.

You could label the "negative terminal" -1.5V and the "positive terminal" 0V. Then your negatively charged electrons flow away from the negative side of the field (because similar charges repel) towards the positive side of the field.

(Electrons themselves do not really "carry" energy, the energy is embodied in the field, and the ability of the field to do work on electrons is the energy.)

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
6
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yep, I know that physically electrons go from - to + due to being negatively charged. My question is more related to the schematic representation of Voltage in a circuit. While I understand why we use an arrow going from - to + (like the direction of the electrons) I am not getting why in this schema Va = 1.5V and Vb = 0V \$\endgroup\$ – MiniYuuzhan Jul 29 '20 at 13:08
  • \$\begingroup\$ You need to see what the implication of electrons being negatively charged is: that they move in the opposite direction to the sign of the field of voltage. \$\endgroup\$ – pjc50 Jul 29 '20 at 13:13
  • \$\begingroup\$ Just as a gravitational field with objects of positive mass causes objects to roll downhill, towards the field, electrons with negative charge "roll uphill" in an electric field. \$\endgroup\$ – pjc50 Jul 29 '20 at 13:14
  • \$\begingroup\$ Noted, so it seems to be the takeaway from this post for me, since I am working with positive voltage (+1.5V) The point with the higher positive potential must be the + side of the battery to follow the direction of positive charges. In your example of putting -1.5V at the negative terminal (A) and 0V at the positive end (B) Still validate Vb > Va \$\endgroup\$ – MiniYuuzhan Jul 29 '20 at 13:32
  • \$\begingroup\$ ? in your picture A is the positive terminal and B is the negative terminal. \$\endgroup\$ – pjc50 Jul 29 '20 at 13:58
1
\$\begingroup\$

0v point of a circuit is completely a matter of choice.

In the above drawing, yo can as well put 0v at point A and then you'll have -1.5v at point B.

It is only the difference that matters.

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ So it is because we want to use positive voltage through the circuit that we use Vb = 0V and Va = 1.5V ? What if we keep these A and B and say Vb - Va = 1.5V ? Is it still correct ? Then Voltage at B becomes 1.5V \$\endgroup\$ – MiniYuuzhan Jul 29 '20 at 13:04
  • \$\begingroup\$ No, you've changed sign. \$\endgroup\$ – pjc50 Jul 29 '20 at 13:05
0
\$\begingroup\$

The battery positive terminal is called the cathode: -

enter image description here

Picture from Battery university

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ It depends on the context. In a lot of cases (e.g. electro-chemistry), the anode/cathode depends not on the potential, but on the current direction and changes on charge/discharge. \$\endgroup\$ – fraxinus Jul 29 '20 at 13:18
0
\$\begingroup\$

As I learned, the arrow of the voltage is commonly drawn from + to - like this:

 -   + |
| |    | 1.5V
| |    |
|_|  - ˅

As the technical direction of current is defined as from + to - it totally makes sense to label the Cathode the higher potential because the energy of a positive charge is higher there.

Edit: Image of a complete schematic:

Image of a complete schematic

Note that all of U_0, U_R, I are positive and of course U_0 = U_R.

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
8
  • \$\begingroup\$ No, the arrow is normally drawn in the direction of increasing potential - the opposite of your drawing. Current is draw in the direction of conventional flow, from positive to negative but through the load, not the power source. \$\endgroup\$ – Transistor Jul 29 '20 at 13:50
  • \$\begingroup\$ I study electric engineering and information technology at KIT (Germany) and we always use the convention in my answer. \$\endgroup\$ – Gedobbles Jul 29 '20 at 13:57
  • \$\begingroup\$ Can you post an example of a circuit showing a power source and a load and the voltage arrows? Danke! \$\endgroup\$ – Transistor Jul 29 '20 at 14:05
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Transistor From what I've seen of this notation, Gedobbles's usage is correct. I don't like using arrows for voltage for exactly this reason -- there's no obvious interpretation for the direction of the arrow. \$\endgroup\$ – Adam Haun Jul 29 '20 at 14:50
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Gedobbles I label them with + and - signs, like the ones on the battery on the left side of your schematic. Here's an example: chegg.com/homework-help/questions-and-answers/… \$\endgroup\$ – Adam Haun Jul 29 '20 at 15:29

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.