2
\$\begingroup\$

I've been working on re-making the two PCBs in the HP 211A square-wave generator from 1955, as the traces on the one I own are starting to peel off.

Focusing on one board, the multivibrator, for the purposes of this post, during the routing I was unsure if having a ground plane covering the whole 198.5mm x 133.5mm (7.8" x 5.25") area of the PCB was a good idea or not, as it could be just a big patch antenna.

So, my question is, at the 1Hz to 1MHz frequency range, would it be more appropriate to use a full ground plane as in "image 1", or a u-shaped ground plane in "image 2"? Lastly, for "image 3", as a sanity check, if I had a full ground plane, the traces I have going to the ground points to the sides would be unneeded, right? The AC would follow the path of least impedance and DC the path of least resistance, making the return traces in the third image useless? Would they make a ground loop as well?

The fourth image is a schematic. This board is everything within the red area except for the multiplier and symmetry potentiometer on the middle-right, which I've sectioned off with some red dashes.

For some additional information, my trace width is 1.5mm whereas the original was 1.7mm, and my spacing between the B- (-195VDC) and lower potential traces is on par or better than the original. (2.4mm or more, which is quite enough.) The trace width will be fine as vacuum tubes will draw very little current, 30 to 40mA give or take.

I’m aware that a star grounding technique would be ideal, but the original board used multiple ground points on the sides like this one, which will be held with screws and nuts to the metal chassis. I'm just looking to improve it where I can and understand how to best implement a ground plane into this 65-year-old design, though if anyone has better grounding suggestion than the ones I’ve presented, I’d be happy to listen. I’d prefer to keep my design close to how it is now, as it almost mirrors the original, save for the smaller and SMD parts.

If I’ve missed any pertinent information or I’ve been unclear about something, please ask and I’ll clarify as best I can.

Image 1 Full Ground Plane

Image 2 U-Ground Plane

Image 3 Do I need These Traces To Ground

Schematic

\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

Instead of Ground plane you should think of rerouting the PCB as there are many mistakes.

  1. Lots of traces are going under components which may heat during work and cause issue.
  2. High Voltage traces are too close.
  3. Thickness of the traces are not according to current requirement.
  4. Proper star connections are not there.

so please after doing all these things

  1. Use a single ground plane with at least 30 mil distance from via or THT Pads.
\$\endgroup\$
5
  • \$\begingroup\$ The original design had the high voltage traces much closer than I have mine and traces running under components in many places. By thickness do you mean width? They're 1.5mm in width while the originals were 1.7mm, so I did admittedly skimp there. What are these kelvin connections? \$\endgroup\$ Oct 6 '20 at 15:20
  • \$\begingroup\$ sorry i mean to say star connection \$\endgroup\$
    – Deepak
    Oct 6 '20 at 15:22
  • \$\begingroup\$ Check V2 pins are too close, please correct them \$\endgroup\$
    – Deepak
    Oct 6 '20 at 15:24
  • \$\begingroup\$ use traces on one side of PCB and components on the other. thanks \$\endgroup\$
    – Deepak
    Oct 6 '20 at 15:25
  • \$\begingroup\$ The trace going from pin 6 past pin 7 is too close. Thank you. Using traces on the other side would make troubleshooting in the future very difficult, as the underside will be blocked once it's installed. Nothing I can do about that. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 6 '20 at 15:25

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.