In sinusoidal steady-state (linear loads, no harmonics), I understand what is reactive power \$Q = V_{\text{rms}} I_{\text{rms}} \sin{(\theta)}\$ where \$\theta = \theta_v - \theta_i\$: its absolute value is the maximum rate of transfer of the energy that's oscillating between the device and the external circuit. This conceptual interpretation is in accordance with the mathematical definition above. I haven't seen/read this interpretation anywhere, but I proved it.
When there're harmonics due to non-linear loads, there're various mathematical definitions of reactive power. This article shows some. One definition I've seen quite often is the following (in the article, it's called Budeanu reactive power in section 3.1):
\$ Q = \displaystyle \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} V_{n,\text{rms}} I_{n,\text{rms}} \sin{(\theta_n)} \tag*{}\$
This mathematical definition is really an "extrapolation" of the definition in sinusoidal SS. But unlike the latter case, here I can't understand what this infinite sum with units of watts represents. (Yes, I know reactive power is measured in VAR, but that unit is dimensioanlly the same as watts and joules per second and volt-amperes.)
Do you know what this means? Can you explain why your interpretation is correct? I'm not asking for analogies, since they at some point break.
I read a textbook in which the author used the same mathematical definition as above, but he said the significance of that was unclear.