Stack Exchange network consists of 181 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.
Electrical Engineering Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for electronics and electrical engineering professionals, students, and enthusiasts. It only takes a minute to sign up.
I have a piezoelectric disc, and I'm trying to use to build a primitive sonar. I connected the disc to an oscilloscope and if I press very hard on the disc, I see that the voltage can spike pretty high. I'm not sure how much current there is.
In an application with a piezoelectric device, should I use a voltage regulator on the output of the piezo, and would that protect my circuit on the other side? I want to connect it to an ATTiny85 without frying the chip.
\$\begingroup\$If you want to transmit a SONAR pulse to get the piezo to ring strong, you want to have a HV transistor to drive it high then open and ring then clamp shut to 0V to discharge the energy fast (blanking) pulse then the Rx echos can be measured except for the tbd xxx ns or us delay time to stop transmitting the ringing pulse. So adding a series resistor makes that less sensitive for the transmission pulse. otherwise a step up pulse transformer can be attempted for Tx with a high side PNP current source then an NPN clamp clamp to gnd with a small deadtime using a half bridge BJT driver.\$\endgroup\$
\$\begingroup\$You might like to read my measurement of piezo spike with and without the protective zener: "Piezo sensor to pick up acoustic instrument signal using Rpi and ADC Asked 1 year ago Active 1 year ago Viewed 569 times": raspberrypi.stackexchange.com/questions/103868/…. Cheers.\$\endgroup\$
How to protecting circuit from piezoelectric disc voltage spike
Answer
The voltage spike might be as high as 30V. You can use a zener to clamp the spike, and NTC inrush current supressor to limit current. See appendices below for more details.
Notes
(1) It is not absolutely necessary to use the ICL (Inrush Current Limiter) NTC thermister to suppress the inrush current. An alternative is to use a series current limiting resistor, say 300Ω. However the NTC-5D7 with only 5Ω resistance should have a better performance.
(2) It is not absolute necessary to use the SPI 12bit single channel ADC MCP3201. The Arduino's GPIO pin with 10 bit rseolution should be OK to do the preliminary testing. For highly sensitive applications, higher resolution ADC, 16-bit, 24-bit can be used.
The MCP3201 is chosen for the following reasone: (a) Single channel MCP3201 is easier to learn and program than the though much more popular 8 channel 10 bit MCP3008. (b) I have written a tutorial and a fully debugged python demo program for MCP3208. So those not using Arduino, eg, Rpi, BBC Micro-ibt, Cortex M0 etc can use micro python or circuit python to run my demo program, with little program modifications.
Appendix E - Buzzer Back EMF 30Vpp 100 ns Spike Wavelet Selfie
The voltage spike can be as scary high as 30Vpp, But the duration is small 100nS. If the human finger lightly taps/knocks the piezo disc, the mechanical energy transferred to the piezo disk should be of the same order of the 5V electromagnetic buzzer's little hammer hitting the bouncing steel spring bar. It is tedious to use my scope's one shot trigger to display my tapping of the disc. So I used the buzzer to display the repeatedly back EMF voltage spike. I did use my scope to zoom in the spike and found her a pretty little wavlet, so I took a selfie picture for her.
Warning to the OP:
(1) But if you are using a big hammer to hit a big disc which is part of a percussion musical instrument, then the spike might be as ridiculous high as 1000+ volts! and for pretty sure fry your ATTiny85.
(2) Me only a friendly electronics hobbyist. No guarantee no nothing won't melt down or blow up, or electrocute a cat.
Appendix F - NTC Thermistor as In Rush Current Suppressor
Inrush current suppressors and surge limiters are types of series connected thermistor whose resistance drops to a very low value as it is heated by the load current passing through it. At the initial turn-on, the thermistors cold resistance value (its base resistance) is fairly high controlling the initial inrush current to the load.
As a result of the load current, the thermistor heats up and reduces its resistance relatively slowly to the point were the power dissipated across it is sufficient to maintain its low resistance value with most of the applied voltage developed across the load.
Due to the thermal inertia of its mass, this heating effect takes a few seconds during which the load current increases gradually rather than instantaneously, so any high inrush current is restricted and the power it draws reduces accordingly. Because of this thermal action, inrush current suppression thermistors can therefore operate very hot in their low-resistive state. As such require a cool-down or recovery period once power is removed thus allowing the resistance of the NTC thermistor to recover sufficiently ready for the next time it is needed.
The speed of response of a current limiting thermistor is given by its time constant. That is, the time taken for its resistance to change by by 63% (i.e. 1 to 1/ε) of the total change. For example, suppose the ambient temperature changes from 0 to 100oC, then the 63% time constant would be the time taken for the thermistor to have a resistive value at 63oC.
NTC thermistors provide protection from undesirably high inrush currents, while their resistance remains negligibly low during continuous operation supplying power to the load. The advantage here is that they able to effectively handle much higher inrush currents than standard fixed current limiting resistors with the same power consumption.
\$\begingroup\$Could you please, please try to post straightforward answers that simply make your point without all this division into less relevant appendicies and links?\$\endgroup\$
\$\begingroup\$I'm affraid you misunderstood the reason for NTC in that inrush limiting circuit. There is absolutely no point to have it like you suggested. You can put there simple resistor and you will get the same result: a low pass filter.\$\endgroup\$
\$\begingroup\$@tlfong01 question about the 1M resistor/zener circuit in practice. It was my understanding that electricity takes the path of least resistance. If you put in a 1M ohm resistor there and there is another option that the electricity flows to my ATTiny85 which I think has an impedence of 250ohms, won't the electricity try to bypass the 1Mohm resistor and try to go to ground through the ATTiny?\$\endgroup\$
Please post a circuit when asking questions. A parallel resistor with a proper value is what you need. The current isn't high. The first circuit is with Arduino. The second circuit is recommended.
The circuit shows a 1MR resistor.
More complex option:
And the best way, but you have to reduce the voltage to 5V or 3.3V, depending on your MCU.
You can always use a standard sonar sensor, but they are expensive.
\$\begingroup\$Parallel? No. Questions on Stack Exchange sites must have stand-alone value, they cannot rely on links for the entirety of any accurate content.\$\endgroup\$
By clicking “Accept all cookies”, you agree Stack Exchange can store cookies on your device and disclose information in accordance with our Cookie Policy.