0
\$\begingroup\$

enter image description here

I have a question about the circuit above.

In the first place we can measure the current IR2 in given values, then using the current mirror topologies we can express IC7, IC8, IC3, IC11 and the other currents at the top which is active loaded differential amplifier topology.

But I cannot find a way to evaluate the currents IR3, IC9 and IC12. Anything would be very helpful.

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • \$\begingroup\$ It looks like you have your LTspice simulation ready to go...why don't you just run the simulation and see what you get? \$\endgroup\$ – Elliot Alderson Dec 28 '20 at 23:25
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ What exactly makes this "huge"? \$\endgroup\$ – Hearth Dec 28 '20 at 23:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ Okan, there's no NFB, neither at AC or at DC. It's open-loop. Technically, with 0 V at the input you'd expect 0V over the resistor. But who can tell if there's no correcting NFB? Also, there's no way to compute the class-AB quiescent current through Q12 and Q9 without knowing measured part details about D1, D2, Q9 and Q12 (and a few more measured details not mentioned.) And even then there are some error bounds to any estimation. \$\endgroup\$ – jonk Dec 29 '20 at 0:27
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks to all of you guys. I get it now. Sorry for that i mentioned it as "huge" because i am very new to these electronic topics. Thanks again \$\endgroup\$ – Okan Dec 29 '20 at 7:18
1
\$\begingroup\$

Without closing the loop the voltage across (and hence current thru) R3 is defined mostly by the parameter variation within the devices, anything spice gives you will be unreliable at best, and it might just peg to one rail in the spice model while doing something different (and probably temperature dependent) in reality.

Feedback would fix that, try about say 19k between the output and the base of Q5 (You will probably want a cap of a few tens of pF across the CB junction of Q11 to stop it oscillating).

Current in Q9, Q12, is dependent on how well their Vt tracks that of the two diodes, real designs add a little emitter resistance to those two transistors and then use a VBE multiplier to allow the operating point to be set reliably (And even then the VBE multiplier transistor needs to be thermally coupled to the output devices).

While you can come up (probably) with something gnarly equating the diode equation and Ebbers-Moll or similar, I would take the view that you have it in spice already, just hit run, it will not be any more wrong then anything else.

It wants feedback, emitter resistors, a dominant pole cap, a VBE multiplier instead of those diodes, degenerate the LTP emitters to improve slew rate, maybe a baker clamp diode to make it better behaved coming out of clipping... Apart from that it is a fine little class B(ish) amplifier.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.