The question might sound silly, but I hope experts can guide me on that particular issue. I am struggling for the last few months. I am a beginner in analog circuit design. When I follow a tutorial, I found that by observing a big transistor (MOS)-level circuit, they can say about node voltages, branch current, input and output resistance, and sometimes gain. My question is, without drawing a small-signal model of those circuits, how do people do that? Is this because they already solved many circuits by hand (I mean not using any simulator), and that is why a concept was built? Even when I try to draw a small-signal model for a big circuit I get lost due to the circuit's complexity. What is a good way to approach this kind of circuit?

I added the figure as an example circuit!

Thanks for your time!

Figure reference: https://www.hindawi.com/journals/apec/2014/274795/

enter image description here


A lot of it is simply seeing/solving circuits and subcircuits often, and being able to pull out those structures and consider their behavior in isolation. Even complex circuits tend to often decompose to a number of simpler elements, allowing a lot of behavior to be qualitatively described quickly, saving mathematical analysis for unfamiliar or unusual sub-structures.

These understandings of common subcircuits, of course, come from mathematically solving those subcircuits for behavior, typical operating point, input/output impedances, etc.

As an example for this circuit, one path of analysis that comes to mind is to:

  1. Assume all MOSFETs in saturation.
  2. Notice that Mk (likely strongly inverted) is giving a constant bias voltage to M3/M4 gates thus making M3/M4 matched cascodes for M1/M2.
  3. Attempt to pattern-match M1/M2 to a current mirror, noting that the gates don't connect to the drain so I might not be able to immediately make that simplification.
  4. Hand-wavily consider M1/M3 as if it were a single transistor with very high output impedance because a cascode structure behaves that way under the assumed conditions. Same for M2/M4.
  5. Now the two sides match a current mirror structure, with high output impedance thanks to the cascode.

At each step, I redraw the circuit (mentally or otherwise) and continue making simplifications/equivalences that seem to simplify it further.

Knowing the circuit's rough structure and behavior allows me to decide what stimuli make sense for it--it can now be simulated to supplement and verify the analysis. If I get unexpected results, I revise my analysis, simulate again, and so on until my understanding and expected/actual results converge.

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ thanks a lot for taking the time to answer my question. I got the idea. \$\endgroup\$ – Shu Jan 15 at 15:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.