1
\$\begingroup\$

I built an attenuator for my guitar amplifier. I took the circuit from here but left out the 4 ohm toggle since my amplifiers all have 8 ohm outputs. Below is a simplified schematic of the circuit (with the L-pad set to 20 dB attenuation):

attenuator schematic

The 4.7u capacitor is supposed to be a treble bleed. My intuitive understanding is that the capacitor allows the high frequencies to bypass the L-pad while the low frequencies are still attenuated. However, I don't notice any difference with the switch open or closed while playing.

I tried to measure the frequency response of the whole attenuator with a signal generator and a scope. The amplitude of the output signal did not change when toggling the capacitor for any frequency up to 20kHz. However I realise that the signal generator and scope have very different output and input impedance compared to the amplifier and speaker, so I don't really trust these results.

My next idea was to calculate the expected cutoff of the treble bleed, but I am not sure how exactly the high-pass filter equation applies here. My understanding is that the speaker is part of the filter, so

$$ R = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{0.89}+\frac{1}{8}} $$ $$ f_c = \frac{1}{2\pi\times4.7\text{u}\times R} = 42281 $$

42 kHz is of course too high for audio, so now I am not sure if my analysis is correct.

  • What is the correct way to analytically determine the treble bleed cutoff frequency?
  • How can I reliably verify this using the signal generator and scope?
\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ The amp will be 0 Ohms not 8 and should boost treble a bit but only if it generates those signals above the breakpoint. Did you want to bleed or boost? \$\endgroup\$
    – D.A.S.
    Commented Jan 15, 2021 at 21:43

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$

The amp is 0 Ohms and the speaker may be neglected. But the ESR of the capacitor must be <0.1 Ohm which rules 99% of electrolytics, so a metal filter cap from a microwave oven or store must be used.

enter image description here

In theory, the cap is not a LPF but a 4kHz HPF The -20dB pad rises to -17 dB at 4kHz

Simply use 7.2 with C to compute breakpoint.

But to make a LPF is harder with a pad as R becomes 0.89 and needs a cap 8x bigger as a shunt.

\$\endgroup\$

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.