The Fourier transform is just an operation on certain functions. When the functions are signals, why is it that the variable chosen (w) has to correspond to the frequency of the signal, when it is just a variable?

  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ If 't' is just a variable and has no physical significance i.e (time, displacement etc) then $$\omega$$is also just a variable after domain transformation and has no physical significance! \$\endgroup\$
    – user215805
    Feb 24, 2021 at 5:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thanks.I didn't think about that. \$\endgroup\$
    – 0-0
    Feb 24, 2021 at 6:22

2 Answers 2


and welcome! You're right that the Fourier transform is just a mathematical operation that you can perform on any function. You can perform a Fourier transform in space (take the Fourier transform of an image, for example), on voltages as a function of time, take the fourier transform of some differential equation, etc.

The reason why \$\omega\$ corresponds to the angular frequency when applied to a signal in the time domain comes from the details of the math. The Fourier transform for a signal \$f(t)\$ can be written as:

$$ F(\omega) = \int f(t) e^{-i\omega t}\, dt $$

so what does that mean? Well, you can write \$ e^{-i\omega t}= \cos(\omega t)-i\sin(\omega t)\$ (Euler's rule), so then you start to see clearly what \$\omega\$ means.

When \$\omega t = 2 \pi\$, then \$\cos\$ and \$ sin\$ would have gone one full cycle. So the amount of time for one full cycle (the period) is: $$ T_P = \frac{2 \pi}{\omega} $$

So that's the number of seconds per cycle. The number of cycles per second (the frequency in Hz) can then be found:

$$ f = \frac{1}{T_P}=\frac{\omega}{2\pi} $$

So that's why the \$\omega\$ of the Fourier transform of a signal is the angular frequency (\$\omega\$). Which is related to the frequency in Hz using the equation above.


Historically the Fourier analysis claimed that any function of a variable, whether continuous or discontinuous, can be written as a series of sines with multiple variables. I think that is where the term frequency comes in to picture. @KD9PDP has nicely explained the mathematical formulation.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.