At 2:57 of this video, it is said that when we apply a small current to the base of the transistor, a large current is passed through. This is fine, but what bothers me is what he says right after: "If we now manipulate the base current in a certain change, the other current changes proportionally with much higher amplitude"

I just can not understand why it is that variations in the base current should amplify the current through the transistor. If I am understanding correctly, if we apply a current on a transistor, then we simply decrease the size of the depletion region and hence make it more conducting. However when we do this, the transistor didn't really amplify any signal, but rather let more of the current pass through.

So, why is it that we say a transistor is working as an amplifier here? Or am I misunderstanding?

  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ exactly, and since the increase in collector current is larger than the increase in bae current, we call that amplification \$\endgroup\$ Mar 1, 2021 at 11:54
  • 6
    \$\begingroup\$ It is not adding current, it is a multiplication. Example for a current amplification of 100 (\$\beta\$ = 100): Base current = 1 uA => Collector current is 100 uA; Base current = 2 uA => Collector current is 200 uA. \$\endgroup\$ Mar 1, 2021 at 11:57
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Amplifying is where we have more power in the output than the input; if there is more current in the collector than the base, then even if the variation of voltage at base and collector were the same, we would have amplification. \$\endgroup\$ Mar 1, 2021 at 12:05
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Where are the extra micro amperes coming from? From another (part of the) circuit or a sensor. To understand amplification, it doesn't really matter. How circuits work (at electron level) is difficult so don't worry if it all doesn't make sense yet. If you keep learning then one day it will all come together and you'll understand. Also, you can use transistors fine without understanding how amplification works. \$\endgroup\$ Mar 1, 2021 at 12:55
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ I'm sorry but how does that linked question relate with mine? @PeterMortensen \$\endgroup\$ Mar 2, 2021 at 10:44

7 Answers 7


I can understand your doubts - because, in reality, the transistor does NOT amplify the base current. It is true that the collector curent \$I_c\$ is proportional to the base current \$I_b\$ (\$I_c/I_b=\beta\$), but this is a kind of correlation.

(It is really a pity that there are still some books and publications claiming that \$I_b\$ would determine \$I_c\$. Nevertheless, during design and/or analysis of transistor stages we can in many cases treat the transistor as if \$I_b\$ would determine \$I_c\$; this is because the relation \$I_c=\beta I_b\$ does apply - but it is a correlation and does not reflect a causality).

It is not a problem to show and to verify that \$I_b\$ as well as \$I_c\$ are both dependent on the voltage \$V_{be}\$ according to Shockley's equation \$I_e = I_s[\mathrm{exp}(V_{be} / V_t)-1]\$ because the emitter current \$I_e\$ is split into a very small current (\$I_b\$) and a larger current \$I_c\$ (\$I_e = I_b + I_c\$).

Final (summarizing) statement (with respect to the long list of comments):

The following sentence alone cannot explain the transistor principle, but it shows that it is the VOLTAGE which plays the decisive role:

In every conductor/semiconductor, a current (movement of electric charges) can exist under the influence of an electric field only. In electronic circuits, this E-field is generated by an external voltage. A change of the voltage (of the E-field) causes a change of the current. This is true, of course, also for diodes, bipolar transistors (BJTs) and FETs.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you kind sir, I was almost losing it after spending one whole day reading from different books and seeing videos and not understanding. Thank you again. \$\endgroup\$ Mar 1, 2021 at 13:22
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Buraian, of course, there are many good (and serious) books/publications which gives you the correct information how transistors really work ("Art of Electronics", papers from Berkeley, Harvard, Stanford, MIT,...). But it is realy disappointing that there are so many contributions (printed and internet) which simply state "current controlled" without any verification. \$\endgroup\$
    – LvW
    Mar 1, 2021 at 14:30
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ So, you have come to the conclusion that Streetman - who wrote a full solid state devices book -is wrong when he shows how the base current controls the collector current? \$\endgroup\$ Mar 1, 2021 at 20:44
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ We can take Hill at his own words \$\endgroup\$
    – J...
    Mar 2, 2021 at 15:31
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ "in reality, the transistor does NOT amplify the base current" Consider a microphone that produces a small peizoelectric current, which is then fed into the base of a transistor, which has a large constant power source applied to its collector. The current that goes out of the emitter will be proportional to the peizoelectric current generated by the microphone, but significantly stronger. It's turning the constant input into the collector into a varying output out of the emitter. \$\endgroup\$
    – nick012000
    Mar 3, 2021 at 4:54

I presume you are just starting out in electronics and, as such, the WHY of the mechanism of a transistor's behavior can be quite intimidating. It's rooted in the physics of how charges work inside the structure that has been created inside the device. If at some point you choose to pursue electronics at a university, perhaps an Electrical Engineering degree program, you will eventually (likely as a 3rd or 4th year student) reach a class named "Semiconductor Physics" or perhaps "Solid-state Physics". There you will learn, in depth, what's going on.

But until that point I urge you to do what engineering student and the vast majority of transistor users do, take it on faith that it works and focus on its higher-level behavior in a circuit rather than the physics of its operation.

If you really want to know this today, I applaud you for your interest and there are any number of resources that you might study to gain an understanding of how semiconductors and ultimately a bipolar transistor works.

Here is a link to an introduction to transistors article that I found that may help you get started:


Here is a short excerpt from that article:

NPN operation

  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you , that article and linked seems helpful for my studies. \$\endgroup\$ Mar 1, 2021 at 13:25
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Quote: "But until that point I urge you to do what engineering student and the vast majority of transistor users do, take it on faith that it works...". But - dont you think that one should know HOW it works? How can somebody design a circuit without knowing how the most important part (BJT) works in principle? I think, its not too complicated....when you know how a pn junction behaves (a simple pn diode) it will not be a great problem to accept that the majority of the emitted electrons will travel to the collector - thats all! \$\endgroup\$
    – LvW
    Mar 1, 2021 at 14:39
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Clearly you didn't read the rest of my answer. But again, how many people regularly and successfully use transistors without any clue of the physics behind them? For the vast majority of users, the small signal model is more than enough. \$\endgroup\$
    – jwh20
    Mar 1, 2021 at 14:50
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Buraian Beginners do grasp the simple basics of FETS. The BJTs cause all the trouble! We haven't answered their questions if we say "just use it, without understanding," or say "its just a bunch of equations." (The same applies to FETs!!!) Why explain FETS, but fail explaining BJTs? It's because the simplified BJT explanations for beginners, are simply wrong: they are widespread misconceptions which have invaded some textbooks. Base current cannot influence Collector current. Instead the accurate explanation involves basic diode operation, and changes to the potential-barrier (Vbe.) \$\endgroup\$
    – wbeaty
    Mar 1, 2021 at 23:57
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @SredniVashtar Instead trust AOA Art Of Electronics, which gets the BJT physics right. If Streetman doesn't employ Ebers-Moll and EB potential barrier, then Streetman is teaching oversimplifications not appropriate for engineering classes. Think: inside FETs, the Ig gate-leakage current can indeed be used to control the magnitude of Id (a Vgs/Ig proportionality does exist.) Even in vac tubes, the grid current can indeed be used to control the plate current. But if we offer these as an explanation of FET or vac-tube operation, we're permanently damaging our students' understanding. \$\endgroup\$
    – wbeaty
    Mar 2, 2021 at 1:04

In fact, OP has understood the naked truth about the transistor "amplifier"... that it is not an amplifier at all... on the contrary, it is an "attenuator". At this stage, OP does not need detailed explanations; he needs confirmation of his guesses.

It is considered the transistor is an active element used to build amplifiers... but IMHO this is not true. The transistor is not active but passive element; the only thing that it can do is to dissipate power. So, the transistor is not amplifying but attenuating element. It is just a "resistor" (non-linear, electrically controlled but still a resistor) that decreases the current.

The true amplification is impossible; so there are no real amplifiers. The so-called "amplification" is just an illusion, a clever trick... and the "amplifier" is just a "magic box" where we see higher output power... but this is not the amplified small input power. This is else's power... of the supply source.

In analog electronics, we implement such an "amplification" in the possibly most paradoxical, absurd and silly way - to obtain output power higher than the input one, we get a big power source and then throw away a part of it (from zero up to the whole power). In comparison, in energetics, they can not afford to do it.

I use this approach in classes with my students to clarify such vague definitions of amplifier as "electronic circuit that uses electric power from a power supply to increase the amplitude of a signal applied to its input terminals" (Wikipedia). For example, here is a seminar in 2004, in which we discussed the philosophy of the transistor "amplifier". Another Wikibooks story from 2008 describes how my students studied this phenomenon in the lab in order to reinvent the BJT current mirror.

In 2013, I asked a similar ResearchGate question which provoked a heated discussion. I hope it will be useful to you.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat. \$\endgroup\$
    – Voltage Spike
    Mar 3, 2021 at 18:29
  • \$\begingroup\$ BTW, the term "amplifier", used without qualification, implies power amplification. This does not mean that the terms "current amplifier" and "voltage amplifier" are invalid or not used. www.britannica.com "Amplifier, in electronics, device that responds to a small input signal (voltage, current, or power) and delivers a larger output signal that contains the essential waveform features of the input signal." \$\endgroup\$ Mar 5, 2021 at 22:14
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Elliot Alderson, I have nothing against using the terms "current amplifier" and "voltage amplifier"... and I regularly use them... but I want us not to forget what lies behind them. The purpose of my answer is to reveal the idea of what we call "amplification" by showing that, at first glance, it is absurd but inevitable in analog electronics. The absurd thing is that we get gain through attenuation: we attenuate the voltage of the supply voltage source but still this voltage is many times higher than the input voltage... and we say that this is an amplified input voltage. \$\endgroup\$ Mar 7, 2021 at 2:29

At 2:57 of this video, it is said that when we apply small current to base of transistor, a large current is passed through,

The ratio, large collector current to small base current, stays more or less constant. It's sufficiently constant that we give it a name, β, or Hfe, or 'current gain'. This is the main defining feature of a transistor, it's what a transistor does. If the base current increases or decreases by a_bit, then the collector current increases or decreases by roughly β*a_bit. That, and the broadly equivalent base voltage controlled collector current behaviour, is all that 99% of practicing electronics engineers use in their day jobs.

Don't worry too much about what depletion region is doing until you're ready to take a full course on Semiconductor Physics. It doesn't really help to know a little bit of the story, enough to get you worried and drawing the wrong conclusions


Keeping it in simple terms for the beginners that we all were once...

The transistor is not an amplifier. On its own, it does absolutely nothing.

However, the transistor can be used to build a circuit that is an amplifier.

For a BJT amplifier, that circuit will use the transistor to pass a current from the circuit's power supply to to the transistor's output pin. That output pin current will be proportionally larger than the current through the transistor's input pin.

This is because the transistor not a 'passive component', it's an 'active component' i.e. it requires a power supply to perform its function.


, if we apply a current on transistor, then we simply decrease the size of depletion region and hence make it more conducting, however when we do this , the transistor didn't really amplify any signal but rather let more of the current pass through.

So in other words, a small current flow causes a large current flow.

That's amplification.

It doesn't say that the large current has to come from the same place as the small current. No, the large current just comes from some kind of power supply. That fact doesn't mean it's not amplification.


To understand what's happening, you have to apply a little bit of quantum mechanics and classical statistical mechanics. When you apply a voltage to the base of an npn, you do shrink the base emitter depletion region, thereby exponentially allowing more electrons in the emitter to diffuse into the base, which then transit the base and end up coming out of the collector. You also decreased the size of the base-collector depletion region, allowing exponentially more holes to flow from the base to emitter.

The net sum of all of these effects is the appearance that a small base current is proportional to the larger collector current (in active mode). The amount of gain depends on how fast and efficiently the minority carriers (electrons in the base of an npn) diffuse through the base from the emitter to the collector. That's the "base transit time" term you see in bjt equations. The faster that is, the higher beta is.

So it's a little more complicated that just two diodes back to back.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.