Consider the relation between the output and input voltages: $$V_o=\frac{V_i}{2}(j-1)$$ where j is an imaginary number, and $$V_i=5sin(1000t)$$ Now, to find the amplitude of \$ V_o \$, should we look at the real part, i.e., $$\frac{-V_i}{2}=\frac{-5}{2}sin(1000t)$$ and say that the amplitude is.$$\frac{5}{2}$$

OR should we take the magnitude of $$\frac{V_o}{V_i}$$ and say that the amplitude is $$\mid V_o\mid= \mid V_i \mid\mid \frac{1}{2}(j-1) \mid$$ where $$\mid V_i \mid = 5$$

  • \$\begingroup\$ Note that Vi is a voltage but Vo/Vi is a unitless number so they measure different things. Amplitude is measured in volts, so that rules out using Vo/Vi. \$\endgroup\$ – ErikR Jun 16 at 12:11
  • \$\begingroup\$ Either use polar notation or complex notation, but don't mix the two. \$\endgroup\$ – Chu Jun 16 at 13:09
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @DomTesilbirthShira please formally accept one answer or raise a comment if further clarification is needed. To understand what I say read this and note that questions that are adequately answered need formal recognition that they are completed. \$\endgroup\$ – Andy aka Jul 11 at 8:54

Complex notation is a useful representation of a real-world signal, which itself does not contain any imaginary part. So, in complex notation:

  • Amplitude is the magnitude of the complex number (btw as Andy says, you lost a square root along the way)

  • Phase is the argument of the complex number

Splitting the real and imaginary parts is useful for other things. For example:

  • If the variable is a power, then the real and imaginary parts correspond to active power and reactive power.

  • If you use IQ demodulation, and multiply your signal with a sine and a cosine, the averaged and lowpass-filtered outputs of these two multipliers will correspond to the real and imaginary parts of the complex variable that represents your signal.

  • \$\begingroup\$ Write your numbers preferably ... real part first, then imaginary ... \$\endgroup\$ – user288518 Jun 16 at 11:19

Now, to find the amplitude of Vo, should we look at the real part

Not if you are aiming to find the magnitude of \$V_o\$. The magnitude of \$1-j\$ is \$\sqrt2\$ and so, the peak magnitude of \$V_o\$ is \$\dfrac{5}{\sqrt2}\$. The RMS value will of course be 2.5 because you divide the peak magnitude by \$\sqrt2\$.

The term amplitude is not really that well defined if you want to be pedantic.

OR should we take the magnitude of \$\dfrac{V_o}{V_i}\$

That would be the peak gain of the circuit and isn't really relevant as far as I can tell. I mean, in terms of what you appear to be asking about, it doesn't appear relevant.


Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.