1
\$\begingroup\$

Why is \$V_o=-V_c\$ in this circuit? Is it a derivation from Kirchhoff's voltage law?

schematic

simulate this circuit – Schematic created using CircuitLab

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Hey , If I were you I would either go through some text or 10min video about virtual short. If you understand that , many such problems can be solved. The answers given below are perfect , but along with that strengthen your basic in this concept since its important. And practice few problems in Sedra or any good text book @JDoeDoe \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 24, 2021 at 11:55

3 Answers 3

4
\$\begingroup\$

The key is to recognize that this circuit has negative feedback, so for an ideal op amp we can assume that \$V_- = V_+\$. Since \$V_+ = 0\,\text{V}\$, \$V_-\$ is effectively connected to ground (a virtual ground). Having made that assumption, KVL can be used to get the result.

\$\endgroup\$
4
\$\begingroup\$

Reasoning: -

  • Both the op-amp inputs are held at the same potential due to negative feedback.
  • Therefore, because +Vin is at 0 volts, -Vin is forced to be 0 volts.
  • You have placed plus and minus signs on the capacitor nodes and, the plus node is forced to be 0 volts (as per what I said above).
  • Therefore, the op-amp output is intrinsically and indisputably the reverse polarity of the capacitor voltage.

Is it a derivation from Kirchhoff's voltage law

No, it's an implication of how an op-amp uses negative feedback and, how the polarity symbols you have applied force \$V_{O}\$ to be the negative of \$V_{C}\$.

\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

That circuit is really an idealized integrator topology. So it's used for cases where you want to integrate. Not perform some KVL solution.

But given your question, the KVL is:

$$V_{_\text{OUT}}+V_{_\text{C}} +I_{R_1}\cdot R_1 - V_{_\text{IN}}= 0\:\text{V}$$

Since \$I_{R_1}=\frac{V_{_\text{IN}}-0\:\text{V}}{R_1}\$, we can re-write the above as:

$$\begin{align*} V_{_\text{OUT}}+V_{_\text{C}} +\frac{V_{_\text{IN}}-0\:\text{V}}{R_1}\cdot R_1 - V_{_\text{IN}}&= 0\:\text{V} \\\\ V_{_\text{OUT}}+V_{_\text{C}} +\frac{V_{_\text{IN}}}{R_1}\cdot R_1 - V_{_\text{IN}}&= 0\:\text{V} \\\\ V_{_\text{OUT}}+V_{_\text{C}} +V_{_\text{IN}} - V_{_\text{IN}}&= 0\:\text{V} \\\\ V_{_\text{OUT}}+V_{_\text{C}} &= 0\:\text{V} \\\\ V_{_\text{OUT}} &= -V_{_\text{C}} \end{align*}$$

In more practical systems the integrating capacitor will have a resistor in parallel to it or else there will be a switch across the capacitor -- perhaps a COTO relay, for example, or else a semiconductor switch -- and the input source will be a photodiode instead of a voltage source. There would also be other switches included, as well. That might be what you'd see for low-frequency photodiode integrator. You can see the basics of such a system illustrated by the Burr Brown ACF2101, for example.

\$\endgroup\$
4
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ However, to get there you do have to assume that \$V_{\text{IN}} = 0\text{V} \$ and that \$I_{R_1} = 0\text{A} \$. I don't think this is true, @jonk . Because, in this special case the op-amp input voltages are \$V_+ = V_- = 0\text{V} \$ which causes \$V_{\text{IN}} = I_{R_1} \cdot R_1 \$ which can be seen by writing the KVL equation for that loop. This causes the term \$I_{R_1} \cdot R_1 - V_{\text{IN}}\$ to disappear in your first equation, regardless of what \$V_{\text{IN}}\$ is. Don't you agree? \$\endgroup\$
    – Carl
    Commented Jul 27, 2021 at 8:15
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Carl Yes. Thanks for the kick in the head. I was focused on the static viewpoint of the author and attempting to over-simplify the situation. But poorly. I can do better and will. Thanks! \$\endgroup\$
    – jonk
    Commented Jul 27, 2021 at 8:55
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ No worries, @jonk. +1 for a great edited answer. \$\endgroup\$
    – Carl
    Commented Jul 27, 2021 at 9:02
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Carl Thanks so much for the privilege you offered in setting this right. It's terrible to have poor material floating about. Too much of it, already. It's my own shame I may have ignorantly added to that pile without your offer. Very much appreciated. \$\endgroup\$
    – jonk
    Commented Jul 27, 2021 at 9:05

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.